You 100% missed my point again. We are talking completely past each other. This could last a month and go nowhere.
I’m out, but just for the record, I never mentioned climate change. Global warming is the modern day name of the theory of man-made global warming. Warmist is another term for the same theory. It has nothing to do with climate change. It is about the alleged anthropomorphic cause of warming.
My point remains. For the sake of argument. "Climate change" is real or it is not. All of what I said still applies. We are discussing truth and how it is proved, not climate change itself. Focusing on the details of "climate change" does nothing for your argument.
Your argument was that you could discern the truth from the way people argued their case. You used the "climate change" argument as your example.
If we can discuss this point for months and still not agree, then I must conclude you are not intellectually honest. Had you proven your case, I would have conceded your point. I am honest like that.
I love to argue. And I love the truth. I will accept it when I see it.
Thank you for indulging me for as long as you did, goodman. I will chalk you up in my argument book as an entertaining win. You lasted longer than most, goodman. I'll argue with you anytime.
Good day to you.