To: Red Badger
"...it would have to be something very very egregious for a court to dismiss the case..." Like withholding evidence? Yeah, I'd think that would qualify.
Judge: Okay, FBI, which would you like to accede to: incompetence or willful misconduct?
FBI: Uh....
Judge: Case dismissed.
4 posted on
01/22/2018 10:15:21 AM PST by
alancarp
(George Orwell was an optimist.)
To: alancarp
Yep...If any of the charges against Manafort are based on the timeline when the messages have gone missing, a partial judge could throw out the charges, AFAIK!
13 posted on
01/22/2018 10:27:15 AM PST by
gr8eman
(Facts and evidence are bourgeois constructs weaponized by patriarchal penis-people)
To: alancarp; Red Badger
"
"...it would have to be something very very egregious for a court to dismiss the case..." Like withholding evidence? Yeah, I'd think that would qualify.
==============================================
Worse that withholding...how about destroying evidence? That would certainly qualify as very very egregious.
48 posted on
01/22/2018 3:33:35 PM PST by
rxsid
(HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson