Why are you spending so much time attempting
to disprove/smear Q?
.... as opposed to just ignoring the obviously
accurate posts?
If it's not valid, and is eating bandwidth and time, shouldn't it be?
I had hoped that when Jim Rob banned the linking of Q's home sites that would take care of it, but apparently not.
Now it appears based on the research in this thread, the hosting site that was referenced in the parent article has a post from Q telling its followers to learn Russian, it would appear. Yet that post from Q is not back on its home site, so even the backup site that is being referenced is not reliable, or the home site wanted the Russian post deleted, etc.
So to summarize, I'm just not seeing a lot of reasons it shouldn't be questioned.