good link to praying medic
~~~~~~~~~~~
and another freeper says this goes with it..
(I saw this earlier, it was declared to be a fraud - you decide..)
Posted on 01/21/2018 11:29:43 AM PST by MNDude
What is GITHUB, and how are Q posts be posted there?
~~~~~~~~~
don’t know - I’m struggling with a ‘C’ in this course..
that is the link that Ransomnote uses for his Q pings - it supposedly rounds up all the Qs...
Check your freepmail.
Why are you spending so much time attempting
to disprove/smear Q?
.... as opposed to just ignoring the obviously
accurate posts?
:-)
Say what?
good link to praying medic
~~~~~~~~~~~
and another freeper says this goes with it..
(I saw this earlier, it was declared to be a fraud - you decide..)
GITHUB is a front end based on web services to display information that is stored in the GIT database. GIT itself is a content management system, for tracking data being moved and and out, as well as signing updates, and is most typically used for software code configuration management. It was originally developed by Linus Torvalds for managing the Linix kernel code, because he wasn’t happy with the open source products of the time, and wanted something to compete with proprietary products like Visual Source Safe/Team Foundation Server, Rational Rose, etc.
I just can’t help myself.
Do you have a link to the page that Q is posting on right now?
At this point, it's quite obvious that Q is a movement and that movement is growing. It WILL have an effect. You can see that effect even here on this thread. The Q deniers are sometimes researching Qs messages even harder than the Q believers.
This is Qs stated mission. To get the populace thinking, researching, talking, and finding out.
How is this a bad thing. We all know more today than we did yesterday, and the day before and so on. Because of Q.
And yet there a handful of "resistors" that are ADAMANT in shutting down Q on this forum. Aggressively and persistently adamant. What is their purpose. At first, I thought it was healthy skepticism, as I once had. But this is beyond that.
I am beginning to wonder what is truly behind the handful of rude, aggressive, disruptors. I saw one, that signed on to FR in March of 2016. Warning flag.
I dunno. It just doesn't make sense that there is a contingent on this patriotic site that, though they don't believe, can't just leave the believers alone to handle their business as they see fit.
If, in the end, we were duped, nobody will be more disappointed than we will. We are placing our hopes for a better country on this issue right here. And we are, in our small way, trying to do our part to help it move along apace. Get out of our way. Nobody really knows where this is going. But it could be very important. Even historical. Don't be the one that stood in the way of the revolution. don't be a Tory.
The game is afoot. If you are too weak to stand, sit in the corner and watch.
We may take this to the real world and the streets before all is said and done. Get in on the ground floor. This forum should be united behind our President. It is the only way we can win.
I implore you to stop fighting amongst ourselves. Come together. If you can't see your way to become involved and follow the threads of perhaps questionable information for its own sake, then stand down. Just stop trying to shut it down.
If we miss this opportunity, it may never come again.
Stand united.
Or Fall apart.
Heed me, O my brothers.
3. Mattis went to Gitmo—video’d—to warn them to prepare for a lot of VIP prisoners
So this appears to be the Q post in question, dated December 27.
https://i0.wp.com/exopolitics.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/QAnon.png
Then here is the article stating that Mattis went to Gitmo, but it is dated December 21st.
https://nypost.com/2017/12/21/mattis-makes-unusual-visit-to-gitmo/
Again, Q’s post regarding Gitmo came a full week AFTER Mattis had already gone to Gitmo.
So again there doesn’t appear to be any proof that Q predicted anything in advance, or that what he did provide in that post was of any value, since it all seems to be broad speculation with still no facts anywhere to support.
So O for 3 on your top 3, unless you think I’ve posted something incorrect, and can back that up.
Ready for more?
good link thanks!!
You’re welcome. Last time I looked it wasn’t update but the guy is a little slow sometimes.
If it's not valid, and is eating bandwidth and time, shouldn't it be?
I had hoped that when Jim Rob banned the linking of Q's home sites that would take care of it, but apparently not.
Now it appears based on the research in this thread, the hosting site that was referenced in the parent article has a post from Q telling its followers to learn Russian, it would appear. Yet that post from Q is not back on its home site, so even the backup site that is being referenced is not reliable, or the home site wanted the Russian post deleted, etc.
So to summarize, I'm just not seeing a lot of reasons it shouldn't be questioned.
Ok dats it!!
Q Ping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
