Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Good.

And hopefully they will indeed take it up right away.

1 posted on 01/18/2018 8:52:32 PM PST by Innovative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Innovative

They should take it and slap down this silly ruling by that judge, but they probably won’t.


2 posted on 01/18/2018 8:56:31 PM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here of Citizen Parents__Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

DACA has become CACA as far as President Trump is concerned, Congress is about to learn how things get done!


3 posted on 01/18/2018 8:57:37 PM PST by heshtesh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative
Great move, on Trump's part!

I hope that SCOTUS takes this case right now!

4 posted on 01/18/2018 8:57:54 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

I wonder what the wise Latina will say? Or the ever lovable Elena Kagan?


5 posted on 01/18/2018 8:59:36 PM PST by samadams2000 (Someone important make......The Call!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative
Thursday night took the unusual step of asking the Supreme Court to immediately review and overturn a judge’s ruling that said the administration

Why WaPhole? Because the so-called "judge" has no or any legal leg to stand on. He's a dumb activist "judge". No need to waste time with it at the 9th Circus.

6 posted on 01/18/2018 9:00:30 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

SCOTUS needs to get off their asses and do this. These little faggot Federal “judges” are overstepping their authority to run this country. It has to stop and these commie activist piggies need to be put in their place.


7 posted on 01/18/2018 9:01:49 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (2017 - The year the liberals' "sexual revolution" strikes back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

8 posted on 01/18/2018 9:04:31 PM PST by Slyfox (Not my circus, not my monkeys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

California’s taking on the federal government with sanctuary cities and writing new laws of their own, to oppose government established laws on immigration, is obstructing constitutional laws and rights of the American “Citizen” in order to protect illegals via Daca.


9 posted on 01/18/2018 9:05:21 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

This is over. Its 5 4 and we did that with our vote. Get these illegal aluens out of our country!!


10 posted on 01/18/2018 9:10:04 PM PST by raiderboy ( "...if we have to close down our government, weÂ’re building that wall" DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

Since O’Muslim did an illegal EO to make DACA, it should be appropriate for Trump to do a legal EO to get rid it. But that’s too simple for Washington D.C.


12 posted on 01/18/2018 9:19:08 PM PST by TheConservativeParty ( Trump is The Storm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

Trump tried the carrot, but with some donkeys the only thing that works is the stick.
Let the beatings commence.


13 posted on 01/18/2018 9:30:23 PM PST by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all white armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative; pookie18
Pelosi_weed_daca
15 posted on 01/18/2018 9:59:24 PM PST by FrankR (Journalists are shoulder-chipped playground kids afraid of being beat up...so, they write.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

DACA is not a law. It is a DNC Business plan for voters, done by an illegal executive order by a president trying to fundamentally change America as we know it. As he promised to do. Legally or otherwise.


16 posted on 01/18/2018 10:05:55 PM PST by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

Dumb.

Are they going to appeal every unconstitutional edict from the lower courts to SCOTUS?

Might as well let the courts run the executive branch.

Like the blue states, media, both parties and corrupt state, the courts are in #resist mode, too.

Time to ignore these pieces of sh!t. Better yet, it’s time to disappear these pieces of sh!t.


21 posted on 01/19/2018 12:50:17 AM PST by Electric Graffiti (Obama voters killed America...Treat them accordingly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative
My prediction...

The Supremes will reject Trump's case 9-0.

Most readers do not understand that Trump and Sessions have not made an Executive “policy” change, which they are allowed to do.

Instead, Trump and Sessions have claimed that Obama’s DACA is unconstitutional, and therefore it cannot be enforced.

The federal judge who rejected their case essentially said that Trump and Sessions have usurped the authority of the Judiciary, and that they have arbitrarily decided what is lawful and unlawful.

Bottom Line - Trump can revoke DACA anytime he wants to.

However, he needs to write an Executive Order that sounds like this:

“According to the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, the DACA kids and their parents are unlawfully present in the USA. Therefore, I order the Secretary of Homeland Security to remove all of them from the country.”

The Courts can't touch an Executive Order like that.

But, tragically, I don't think Trump will ever write an E.O. like that.

22 posted on 01/19/2018 1:08:46 AM PST by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

This is the trouble with lawlessness. There is no law for DACA. The original Obama EO was unconstitutional.

What did the judge make a ruling on?

There needs to be some kind of accountability for this type of foolishness.


25 posted on 01/19/2018 3:45:28 AM PST by IamConservative (Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

President Trump may know that there may be some in-Justices missing and stationed in Gitmo where the rule of law will be enforced on the side of LEGAL America.


28 posted on 01/19/2018 4:13:43 AM PST by eartick (Been to the line in the sand and liked it, but ready to go again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

SCOTUS needs to appoint a Master judge that deal with these types of issues between liberal appeal courts interfering with enumerated powers of another branch of government. The only other alternative is for Trump to just ignore the appeals court ... but I think that’s the Progressives are trying to provoke.


30 posted on 01/19/2018 4:53:36 AM PST by Fhios (1987 - Where's Waldo. 2017 - Where's Jeff Sessions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative
the DACA kids and their parents are unlawfully present in the USA. Therefore, I order the Secretary of Homeland Security to remove all of them from the country.”

...and the kids of these "kids"?

:-/

35 posted on 01/19/2018 5:45:01 AM PST by Does so (McAuliffe's Charlottesville...and...The Walter Duranty Press"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson