Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: shove_it

Yes. Bigger pipes, using an existing right of way, BUT the pipeline in the trench must be taken out of service during the upgrade, no?


4 posted on 01/17/2018 11:37:42 AM PST by Darteaus94025 (Can't have a Liberal without a Lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Darteaus94025

Maybe so, but if the pipeline companies are doing it, it must be profitable to do so.


5 posted on 01/17/2018 11:40:41 AM PST by shove_it (MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Darteaus94025
Yes. Bigger pipes, using an existing right of way, BUT the pipeline in the trench must be taken out of service during the upgrade, no?

Not necessarily. You install the larger pipe next to the existing pipe and, if the existing pipe is in good repair, leave it and use it for overflow capacity or a maintenance bypass for the future. I think a lot of these "lines" are more than one anyway. Concept is the same.

7 posted on 01/17/2018 11:44:52 AM PST by Tenacious 1 (You couldn't pay me enough to be famous for being rich or stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson