[Reno89519]

I figure schooling is the negotiable part. If we allow any form of waivers for kids--not the illegal families--then we need to negotate on a. ages (arrived under 8-12 year old?), b. arrival date (pre 2008?), c. are they in school now?, etc. I'd push for 8 years old, pre-2018 pre-2008 so we are only talking about school-age kids, still in school. Since none over 18, they don't need work permits. And, being nice, let them finish current school year before going home.

[i_robot73]

>
I figure schooling is the negotiable part. If we allow any form of waivers for kids—not the illegal families—then we need to negotate on a. ages (arrived under 8-12 year old?), b. arrival date (pre 2008?), c. are they in school now?, etc. I’d push for 8 years old, pre-2018 pre-2008 so we are only talking about school-age kids, still in school. Since none over 18, they don’t need work permits. And, being nice, let them finish current school year before going home.
>

What part of ‘illegal’ or ‘criminal’ is hard to understand?

How does one *verify* ‘arrival’??

Being nice? That’s not THEIR $$ being used to provide for their education, taking up a LEGAL/citizen job (suppressing wages) nor farking over a legal/citizen’s identity.

I, for one, am tired of ‘compassionate (C)’. What’d ya want to do next, “win hearts and minds’ too?