Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Golden Eagle

Now you are straining at gnats.

Yes, there was a conviction. In the story. Yes, months ago.

TENEX. That’s U1 involvement.

ANYTHING from DOJ is Sessions. He supervises, he approves budgets. This is what you still haven’t gotten about Mulehead. He HAS NO BUDGET aside from that which Sessions oversees and approves. Sessions sees (and therefore Trump knows) every single line item in Mulehead’s budget-—how many staff, where they work, where they travel, everything.

So if DOJ is investigating, that’s Sessions.

Gettin’ close to the old eating crow time. I can provide salt.


81 posted on 01/13/2018 8:10:34 AM PST by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]


To: LS
Yes, there was a conviction. In the story. Yes, months ago.

Who, what, when, where, how? As I said, I am eager to be corrected, and learn more about what is truly going on. But as of now, the claim that there was a Uranium One conviction just months ago appears be complete disinformation.

ANYTHING from DOJ is Sessions.

Unfortunately, this shows that your baseline foundation is completely off. But it does explain why you then get so many details wrong when you try to explain things. I could bury you in an avalanche of articles proving you're wrong, but will stick to this one since it directly relates to the specific budget claim you seem insistent on making:

Republicans spoil for a fight over Russia probe budget

Mueller is subject to some oversight. He had to produce a budget proposal to DOJ earlier this summer for the next fiscal year. And an internal DOJ audit office must review the first 4½ months of his spending receipts. Mueller isn’t under day-to-day DOJ supervision, but Rod Rosenstein, the deputy attorney general overseeing the investigation after Attorney General Jeff Sessions recused himself, does have final say on some of the major decisions related to the Mueller probe, including his budget.

85 posted on 01/13/2018 8:21:14 AM PST by Golden Eagle (Trump: "I'm disappointed in the Attorney General. He should not have recused himself immediately...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

To: LS
In the story. Yes, months ago. TENEX. That’s U1 involvement.

Where did you go? I searched the whole article for the word "Tenex" and it doesn't even appear. So I searched Google for "Tenex conviction" and found one from back in 2015, as I originally said. That hardly classifies as "months ago" so still waiting for your response, and hoping you have something better. Thanks.

101 posted on 01/13/2018 8:53:20 AM PST by Golden Eagle (Trump: "I'm disappointed in the Attorney General. He should not have recused himself immediately...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

To: LS

And I’ll provide the fork.


125 posted on 01/13/2018 2:43:06 PM PST by little jeremiah (Half the truth is often a great lie. B. Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson