I never claimed that. I simply said as special prosecutor investigating the President, there is precedent to force the President to testify, or plead the 5th. And acting AG Rosenstein has rebuffed any questions as to whether Mueller has the full support of the DOJ. Rosenstein used to work for Mueller, and acts like he still does.
But don't consider me an advocate for Mueller, in the least, I am one of his biggest critics on FR.. If you've seen my posts you would have noticed I have aggressively attacked those here who actually are supporting Mueller by claiming that he is secretly working for Trump. My goal is to bring awareness to the threat, which is real. Just like you have to properly identify the threat as "Islamic Terrorism" before you can actually fight it. You have to be aware of the full context of the "Mueller Threat" before you can defend from it.
.
>> “ I simply said as special prosecutor investigating the President, there is precedent to force the President to testify, or plead the 5th.” <<
That is utter nonsense from beginning to end!
No prosecutor can “investigate the President.”
Only a congressional committee can investigate the President, and they have no power to demand his presence nor testimony. (separation of powers)
The Mueller threat can be neutralized politically.
Trump can publicly demand that any interview is the exact equivalent of Hillary’s to include his right to retain and destroy all computers and phones.
He can be accompanied by any other people targeted in the probe.
He is not sworn in.
No recordings except those HE makes.
The list goes on.
And of course, he gets a letter of exoneration -in advance-.
Also, he can easily look at Muellers team that is deeply compromised and composed of those who were spying on him and announce he will not be interviewed by any of the conspirators. He can and will demand that Mueller demonstrate solid evidence of collusion and that he explain what law “collusion” would violate.
Sekulow is going to slice an dice this Mueller scam.