Posted on 01/10/2018 4:21:05 PM PST by Red Steel
We’re just days away from a government shutdown and Democrats are still attempting to write the rules, despite being in the minority.
Back in September, President Trump ended Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program from the executive branch and kicked it over to Congress where it belongs.
“Congress, get ready to do your job — DACA!” he tweeted. From the beginning, when President Obama unconstitutionally implemented the program, the protections for those brought into America illegally by their parents were temporary. After all, the “D” in DACA stands for “deferred” and the courts ruled the issue can’t be implemented solely through an executive order. “Every DOJ and DHS lawyer says DACA is unconstitutional. Every other legal scholar — right and left — says the same thing. Trump didn’t end DACA, the law did. That said, I worked and succeeded to give the Congress another six months to do something,” White House chief of staff John Kelly said at the time.
Trump isn’t a hard-liner on DACA and has repeatedly countered his hardcore base to express sympathy for DACA recipients. He’s made it clear there’s always been room on his end for a compromise.
“We’re working on a plan — subject to getting massive border controls. We’re working on a plan for DACA. People want to see that happen. You have 800,000 young people brought here, no fault of their own. So we’re working on a plan. We’ll see how it works out. We’re going to get massive border security as part of that. And I think something can happen, we’ll see what happens, but something will happen,” Trump said last fall.
When Trump made the announcement, Republicans quickly jumped into action. Sens. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) demanded a DACA fix be a priority before the sixth month deadline. Before Washington left for Christmas break after passing tax reform, it was reiterated that DACA would be a top priority as soon as lawmakers came back to town.
Republicans were and still are willing to find a DACA fix, so long as border security conditions are met to prevent future amnesties. They know the American people have been here before. They’ve been repeatedly promised security in return for empathy and generosity, while never receiving the former. That isn’t going to fly. But rather than use the opportunity on Capitol Hill to help a group of young adults they claim to care about, Democrats are holding the government hostage over their open border, pro-amnesty for all agenda.
Republicans and the White House want three things in return for DACA: a border wall, an end to chain migration and an end to the visa lottery program. This is a fair deal, especially because Democrats have been on board with these measures in the recent past.
In 2006 nearly two-dozen Democrats, including now-Minority Leader Charles Schumer (N.Y.), voted for the Secure Fence Act. It passed with bipartisan support 80-19. The idea was similar to what Trump wants: secure and bolster the southern border with a fence. The wall is simply an upgrade.
Again in 2013, there was bipartisan agreement on the negotiation pieces currently on the table for DACA. The Gang of Eight immigration reform bill, made up of Republicans and Democrats, ended chain migration and the diversity visa lottery program. Schumer was an advocate for the bill, as was fellow Democratic Sen. Dick Durbin (Ill.). Over the years, Democrats have repeatedly voted to expand Border Patrol and to increase the number of Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents. Now that Trump’s in charge, they’ve run away from all of it.
That history doesn’t seem to matter now as Democrats look to resist Trump at all costs, even if it means a government shutdown and a failure to pass a DACA fix.
“The White House issued a series of unreasonable demands entirely outside the scope of our ongoing negotiations about DACA and border security,” Schumer said last week.
Republicans, given Democrats’ voting history, are frustrated and confused.
“Why do my colleagues in Democratic leadership refuse to even consider measures that would beef up border security and interior enforcement? Do they want people to continue to immigrate to this country illegally?” Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) asked Fox News’s Chad Pergrum this week.
“Why won’t Democratic leadership negotiate with us? Because we refuse to simply pass the Dream Act, as is, with no proportional border security and interior enforcement measures. As the Democrats see it, it’s take it or leave it. Their way or the highway,” he continued.
While the American people support DACA, they also support strong border security and immigration policy in return for amnesty or protections similar to it. At this point, Democrats are more interested in using DACA as a political hammer against Republicans and the White House than they are concerned about solving the problem. After all, fixing the issue would take that tool out of their political arsenal for future debates.
If Democrats truly care about protecting DACA recipients, they’ll vote for it in exchange for border security they’re already on the record supporting. Until then, they’re simply bluffing and using young people as pawns.
National e-verify.
Added to the wall, end to chain migration, and the visa lottery should be an end to the anchor baby loophole that really isn’t part of our US Constitution anyway and protection for American working people by mandatory e-verify for new and existing employees with very heavy penalties (jail time) and fines for those who get caught not doing it. It’s time to MAGA now!
Now I realize the dems would never go for all of this at once so the wall, the chain, and the lottery in phase one. Ending birthright citizenship, merit based migration, and implementing e-verify can be part of phase 2 but no one gets amnesty ever again. DACA allowed to stay with a green card to work but not vote and not get taxpayer benefits - okay. No amnesty!! Want to become and American citizen? Do it the right way like anyone else by applying. This is why merit-based legal immigration is so important. Just having a relative here is NOT a good enough reason unless you’re married to that person. One must bring something to the table just like we have to in order to emigrate to someplace like AU, NZ, the UK, etc. etc.
“In 2006 nearly two-dozen Democrats, including now-Minority Leader Charles Schumer (N.Y.), voted for the Secure Fence Act. It passed with bipartisan support 80-19. The idea was similar to what Trump wants: secure and bolster the southern border with a fence. The wall is simply an upgrade.”
Someone ought to mention this to Rand (The Little D!ck) Paul!
No citizenship ever, for any DACA “baby”
Dems never will agree to only green card status because they can’t vote in federal elections. Still, they can vote in local and state elections, so could still do some real damage.
I am soooo looking forward to Jan 19th ....
The fence never got built.
Kay Bailey Hutchison R-TX clawed the money back in a later bill.
Sounds completely reasonable. And add, all males and unattractive or hostile females.
Any DACA left that are qualified must leave the country until the wall is complete, and then apply for re-entry and be vetted including based on merit.
Except for the chicas calientes.
What happens when a family member of a DACA gets Deported?? OMG! You’re breaking up a family...you cann’t do that, so then Chain Migration is the next Pro-Dem Cause celeb!
Just two of many GOP senators who feel that illegal aliens are more important than citizens.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.