Posted on 01/10/2018 11:42:06 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Annie, I think it’s time for you to go to the corner for time-out. You’re not helping........
Romney/Coulter/TuckerCarlson
Maybe you can tell Tucker Carlson that.
One of you knows something the other doesn’t.
Her game plan has always been a book every two years. Thus far, it’s been quite lucrative.
This the same woman who wrote “The Conservative Case for Mitch McConnell”.
Dude, their already here, and their already voting. Focus on the prime objective - we must Build the Wall!
When she lost FReepers, she lost it all.
Kamala Harris is not eligible to be President of the USA.
Glad you brought that up! Yet many are suggesting she is “The One” for 2020...Folks may want to start screen-saving documents on her early life and her parents’ citizen status as I have an idea thoses things might somehow be changed should she decide to run...
Will be interesting to see how the press deals with her eligibility...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamala_Harris
Harris was born on October 20, 1964 in Oakland, California to a Tamil Indian mother, Shyamala Gopalan Harris (1938–2009), and a Jamaican father, Donald Harris. Her mother was a prominent breast cancer researcher, who emigrated from Chennai, India, in 1960,[7][8] and her father a Stanford University economics professor, who emigrated from Jamaica in 1961 for graduate study in economics at University of California, Berkeley.[13]
I hope Tucker isn’t becoming untucked.
Well, Ann Coulter, Laura Inghram, Rush Limbaugh, Tucker Carlson, and any other talking head on the conservative side, who have a problem with the President’s decisions on the immigration issue, DO NOT speak for me or any conservative that I know in my family or my circle of conservative friends.
Donald Trump is not going to deport 800,000 thousand, 11 million, 35 million, or whatever number of people it may be, when they were brought here through no fault of their own, have lived a lifetime here, and have done so only because previous administrations and Congress, have refused to enforce our immigration laws.
He is addressing this complicated issue with a balanced approach of getting those people legalized and securing our borders at the same time, including building the wall.
And I LOVE that he is bringing in the Democrats and seeking a compromise, rather than shutting them out like Obama did the Republicans.
Having these negotiations televised, helps to educate the public on everyone’s position and what our country is facing.
There is so much anger and resentment against illegal people on our side, that they are willing to throw the President overboard, even after all of the good he has done for our country.
It infuriates me.
Donald Trump was NEVER an ideologue, he’s a pragmatist. What he is doing makes sense to him, and it makes sense to me.
I trust Trump’s jusdgement. I do believe the border hawks should be hawkish to show Trump there is concern about the safety of this country.
We do need to shut off the immigration flow. Trump said this morning that no deal on DACA without funding and construction of a border wall.
Those mock tweets are hilarious. Ann still has her sense of humor but seems to have lost her common sense.
Yeah, someone’s gullible!
>>He is addressing this complicated issue with a balanced approach of getting those people legalized and securing our borders at the same time, including building the wall.
Donald Trump is not going to deport 800,000 thousand, 11 million, 35 million, or whatever number of people it may be, when they were brought here through no fault of their own...
There is so much anger and resentment against illegal people on our side, that they are willing to throw the President overboard, even after all of the good he has done for our country. It infuriates me.
Donald Trump was NEVER an ideologue, he’s a pragmatist. What he is doing makes sense to him, and it makes sense to me.
***********************************************************
“through no fault of their own”? So, is that OUR fault? Why should WE have to pay or assume any responsibility for something WE, ordinary citizens, didn’t do? What’s infuriating is to watch our country being given away, rewards for the children of parents who illegally invaded, and us having to pay to watch it happen.
We believed Candidate Trump when he said “Sorry, they have to go back.” Whether you like it or not, the reality is, if this promise of a very SIMPLE Law & Order solution to a SIMPLE problem (from U.S. citizens POV which is the ONLY POV that matters) is not followed through, enough voters WILL return to sitting out elections again. Whether they haven’t thought that action through to your conclusion or not is irrelevant. They will do so just the same. The country is lost either way.
Candidate and President-elect Trump stated very clearly he would NEVER disappoint us and NEVER let us down. If he backtracks on DACA, not only will he do just that, he will have ensured Dem victories henceforth, and the country will have sustained its final “nail”.
Compassionate amnesty for the children of the illegal invaders at our expense is unpatriotic and treasonous, IMO. If he does this, it’s game over for America.
Good one.
I absolutely agree that we need to shut off the immigration flow, and I believe that the President will construct the wall, but that is not what conservative mouthpieces like Ann Coulter are talking about.
She and other conservatives, don’t want President Trump to endorse a pathway to citizenship for the so-called, “Dreamers,” they want him to deport ever one of them.
He’s not going to do that and I agree with him.
Secure our border, build the wall, and legalize the illegals brought here.
I don’t believe ANY of these polls. I could ask 100 of my friends and family and not one would be for amnesty of any kind and almost all in favor of the wall. The wall IS what got him elected. We are being played by the Establishment again.
Nice Adams apple - oh man.
I recall threads when I first signed up to FR back in 2003 and every time there was a thread with Ann Coulter there were Freepers swooning over her. I never understood that AT ALL. The adam’s apple was the dead giveaway.
Naturalization is limited to the same kindred or kind.
Emancipation was UnNaturalization, the Reconstruction Amendments were UnNaturalization.
Congress cited Article 1, Section 8, uniform rule of naturalization as their authority to unnaturalize the country.
Natural is a Kind. The Founders were clever.....
Caracalla unnaturalized Rome....our military is unnaturalized...our government is unnaturalized...Obama was unnatural born.
Doesnt anyone know what natural means?
The Founders wanted a country filled with citizens and immigrants their own natural kind.
That’s what naturalization means.
There's one teensy-weensy problem with all this. Blacks, who were the beneficiaries of all this, were and are not a bunch of alien foreigners. They're among the very oldest of American population groups, having been here since at least 1619, and in fact one could say that if Anglo-Saxons own the country, Blacks would be the heir-apparent.
Blacks even have the same religion as poor rural Southern whites: Fundamentalist Protestantism. But since both sides insist that the blood of kinship is thicker than the waters of baptism, they've never treated each other as co-religionists. First the whites were on top and treated Blacks as sub-human, and now the Blacks are on top and have hopped in bed with Communism, homosexuality, abortion, and evolution and seem to think they'll never have to pay for it.
I find it interesting though that you say we were unnaturalized by emancipation. Why were we not unnaturalized by the importation of Blacks as slaves when there were plenty of poor whites around who were barely able to live? But for some reason you regard thousands and thousands and thousands Blacks in America as perfectly all right, so long as they're not free citizens. Most curious.
Blacks are certainly the least alien of all "minority groups," being Southern, rural, agricultural, and fundamentalist in origin, though no one on either side of the race war seems to ever notice that. Booker T. Washington asked employers to reject foreigners of strange tongue and manner in favor of the Blacks who had lived here for generations whose ways, speech, and religion were perfectly natural and at home here. I don't suppose anyone remembers that?
But it's really strange. I honestly believe that if America were inundated by Lovecraftian entities, and friction were to spring up between them and Blacks, that "nativist" conservative whites would side with the Lovecraftian entities while the xenolatrous, "otherness" adoring liberals would be making speeches against the "old 'gxds'" in Black churches throughout the rural South. I don't think I'll ever understand it.
Just how many billions and trillions and zillions of years of "evolution" do you think separates the various races of mankind, O "proud Southerner???"
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.