Oh, as for men being the winners... maybe? I think they have the advantage until they either get married or impregnate some woman, and then the tables flip with lightning speed. For myself, it’s not about winning or losing. It’s just about being able to live alone and free, and pay my own way, and... just be free. I can’t put it any other way: I do not like being a wife or a girlfriend or a lover or any of it. A hundred years ago, I’d have had little choice unless I had a father who supported me, maybe had a business and helped me out, or put me through school. But my own father was a deadbeat with criminal tendencies, my mother’s family was poor, I was on my own. So yes, without laws that enabled me to join the military, work my way through school, get credit, get a place of my own, etc... I’d have had a lot fewer opportunities.
Thanks again for the reply. Feminazism has always used lofty terms like “freedom” and “suffrage” and “equality”to justify its actions. But the closer you look at it, the more you see that the justifiable grievances that the feminazi movement has cited have been relatively few, and relatively mild as compared to the collateral damage wrought. Marriage is a multi thousand year old tradition that exists primarily for the protection of women and children. Hats off to the feminazism movement; they managed to pretty much end it in the US in two generations.
And yes like any war, there are winners and losers. Women and children in general have been the big losers. Marriage only continues amongst upper and upper middle class. Women who want the freedom to have a traditional marriage and raise children are largely denied the opportunity due to a lack of willing men. Women who want the career and all the trappings are getting to enjoy that...alone.
Feminazism has indeed exacted it’s revenge on men, but the price tag for doing so is an informal counter movement that has been devastating in it’s effectiveness and impact on women.