Posted on 01/06/2018 10:48:03 AM PST by Clioman
That’s “cool.” Just remember, when people in 2004 were ready to jump off cliffs on election day, I kept saying (and knew) “we won OH. We won the election.”
When some people (fewer now it seems) were saying in 2016 that Trump wasn’t going to win, or that Cruz would win the primary, I kept saying based on evidence Trump would win (as I posted on Twitter on Aug. 20, 2015 [!!]), “Trump will win with between 300 and 320 electoral votes.”
I think everything is lining up for Mulehead to exonerate Trump as soon as the IG report comes out, or thereabouts, on the 15th, and join a recommendation for a second special counsel, handing over all his investigation into Manafort, Tony Two-toes, Pedo, McCabe, and all the rest. Either he will prosecute them directly or he will concur with the second special counsel recommendation. Either way, he has worked for months at the behest, and with the full knowledge of Sessions.
Look at a Fed Govt flow chart. No matter how “recused” he appears to be, Sessions MUST oversee the Special Counsel’s budget and question any line items that don’t make sense. HE, not RR, turns in the budget. So Sessions has had full knowledge of everything Mulehead has done.
Now we get word (as I said) of a DOJ (that would be Sessions) investigation of the Clinton Foundation that has been going on for “months.” Wait-—I thought Sessions wasn’t doing anything?
Richard Baris has interviewed two of the witnesses before Mulehead’s VA grand jury and said that ALL of the questions they were asked were about Manafort and Podesta, NOT Trump. So far, I don’t know anyone else who has said differently. Remember Hope Hicks? What happened to that big interview? I don’t think Mulehead has ineterviewed Don, Jr. Supposedly they are “talking” about interviewing DT. Gee, what a great opportunity for DT and Mulehead to discuss the progress of the case against Cankles without any idea by the press they were “collluding.”
——Sessions has had full knowledge of everything Mulehead has done-—
You speak of smoke, perhaps only whiffs of smoke
The anti Sessions FReepers want hellfire......Now!
Just look at a flowchart of where the money goes, and who approves it. No matter how “recused,” the Attorney General knows exactly what’s going on because of the budget lines, and has so informed the President.
This is why Trump says, “I’m not under investigation.”
BTW, where do you think all these leaks about Ohr, McCabe, Deep Stroke & the rest come from? Mulehead has them all corralled where they can do no more harm and is selectively leaking to his (former) buds at The Hill and Politico . .. and they think they got “scoops.”
Things do seem to be unraveling for the bad guys...It would seem Nunes, Jim Jordan and some of the others would be on the fast track with a lot of that information so calling for the removal of Sessions is just theater???
I have no idea why you would believe that, when all reports are he's currently focused his investigation on Trump family members, to include his daughter now too, and planning to interview the President himself soon. If you have *anything* to the contrary, you should post it now, although since you didn't yet I'm assuming you don't.
Certainly the I-G report is going to blister the Obama Administration, and right behind it will come the new email and Awan indictments.
You seem exceedingly positive, and again I'm not sure why, without some actual evidence to back up your thinking. Not that I'm negative, because I'm not, but a couple of anonymous sources saying the corrupt DOJ suddenly is on top of all this is hardly proof positive of anything. I'm not falling for it, and intend to keep the pressure up, until I see good reason not to.
Nothing personal, but I’m not seeing much reason to believe in your latest predictions either. Just for the record, so we can score these out later:
1. “I think everything is lining up for Mulehead to exonerate Trump as soon as the IG report comes out, or thereabouts, on the 15th”
Highly unlikely. Reports are he’s just started looking into the President’s daughter, and wants to interview the President, which will take some time to iron out, if it ever even happens. Today is the 8th already.
2. “(Mueller will) join a recommendation for a second special counsel handing over all his investigation into Manafort, Tony Two-toes, Pedo, McCabe, and all the rest. Either he will prosecute them directly or he will concur with the second special counsel recommendation.”
Good to see you are now willing to admit it’s possible that Mueller isn’t going to ever prosecute any Democrats, since there’s no evidence of it. However that still doesn’t mean that Mueller is now going to support any second special counsel to investigate the Clinton cabal, because Mueller is one of the chief suspects of covering up Clinton crimes. He could just investigate them himself, as you originally predicted, if he wanted to investigate them. Therefore I predict that Mueller’s support of a second special counsel is highly unlikely.
3. “Either way, he has worked for months at the behest, and with the full knowledge of Sessions....Now we get word (as I said) of a DOJ (that would be Sessions) investigation of the Clinton Foundation that has been going on for “months.” Wait-—I thought Sessions wasn’t doing anything?”
There is ample evidence that Jeff Sessions is completely recused from anything to do with any potential Clinton investigations. In fact, he has testified under oath, multiple times to that effect. And the exact person that broke the story that the Clintons may now be under investigation, being John Solomon, recently stated that any new investigation of the Clintons came from the field, not Sessions or DC. Therefore I consider the statement that Sessions is involved in any investigations of Clinton as highly unlikely, unless you have any evidence to present in support of it.
4. “Richard Baris has interviewed two of the witnesses before Mulehead’s VA grand jury and said that ALL of the questions they were asked were about Manafort and Podesta, NOT Trump.”
This information is several months old now, and is what you based your original prediction that Podesta was going to be arrested on. Richard Baris himself shortly thereafter came out and stated that anyone believing that Mueller was working for Trump to go after Clinton was “insane” and I shared his tweet with you. Therefore again it appears highly unlikely that this evidence proves that Mueller is working for Trump.
5. “Remember Hope Hicks? What happened to that big interview? I don’t think Mulehead has ineterviewed Don, Jr. Supposedly they are “talking” about interviewing DT.”
Yes, additional interviews are planned, possibly even of Trump himself. Therefore your prediction that this will all be wrapped up shortly after January the 15th is highly unlikely.
6. “Gee, what a great opportunity for DT and Mulehead to discuss the progress of the case against Cankles without any idea by the press they were “colliding.” “
Assuming you meant “colluding” but there is little evidence to support your claim that Mueller is working for Trump, or that Trump’s interview by Mueller will be about potential charges against Hillary, and not designed to further Mueller’s ongoing case against Trump. Therefore again I rate your prediction as highly unlikely.
Hopefully you won’t personally attack me for this analysis, as I have attempted to avoid any personal insults of you by posting them. I just don’t see your predictions as likely, and I see no reason why any Freeper should believe that Mueller is an ally of Trump. My opinion is that we should see Mueller as a dangerous enemy to the President, and anyone asking us to lower our guard and support Mueller should be countered with great skepticism. Hopefully I am wrong, and I will gladly admit it should that come to pass, but as of now there’s still no reason to believe otherwise in my opinion. Thanks!
bump!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.