Replies

To: bitt

"The FBI" didn't rule. Some individual at the FBI ruled that McCabe had no conflict. I just looked at the relevant document. As far as I can tell, McCabe himself ruled ("Approved By: McCABE ANDREW G") that he, McCabe, had no conflict!

Wonder of wonders!

34 posted on 01/06/2018 4:30:10 AM PST by Paine in the Neck ( Socialism consumes EVERYTHING!)

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paine in the Neck

Good catch! That’s funny right there!

41 posted on 01/06/2018 5:40:26 AM PST by Bshaw (A nefarious deceit is upon us all!)

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Paine in the Neck; Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; ...

see#34

thanks, Paine

https://vault.fbi.gov/deputy-director-mccabe-ethical-guidance-and-recusal/deputy-director-mccabe-ethical-guidance-and-recusal-part-01-of-01/view

49 posted on 01/06/2018 8:21:57 AM PST by bitt (The first to squeal gets the best deal.)

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Paine in the Neck

“The FBI” didn’t rule. Some individual at the FBI ruled that McCabe had no conflict. I just looked at the relevant document. As far as I can tell, McCabe himself ruled (”Approved By: McCABE ANDREW G”) that he, McCabe, had no conflict!

Wonder of wonders!

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Seriously?. mccabe signed off on his own no conflict report?

bout par for the course with this bunch

56 posted on 01/06/2018 1:07:37 PM PST by thinden

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search

News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794