(excerpt)
...the review will examine the following issues:
Allegations that Department or FBI policies or procedures were not followed in connection with, or in actions leading up to or related to, the FBI Directors public announcement on July 5, 2016, and the Directors letters to Congress on October 28 and November 6, 2016, and that certain underlying investigative decisions were based on improper considerations;
Allegations that the FBI Deputy Director should have been recused from participating in certain investigative matters;
Allegations that the Departments Assistant Attorney General for Legislative Affairs improperly disclosed non-public information to the Clinton campaign and/or should have been recused from participating in certain matters;
Allegations that Department and FBI employees improperly disclosed non-public information; and
Allegations that decisions regarding the timing of the FBIs release of certain Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) documents on October 30 and November 1, 2016, and the use of a Twitter account to publicize same, were influenced by improper considerations.
Well that’s good of you to post the OIG release that I linked to. Perhaps that will make it easier for you to notice that:
Allegations that the Departments Assistant Attorney General for Legislative Affairs improperly disclosed non-public information to the Clinton campaign and/or should have been recused from participating in certain matters;
Allegations that Department and FBI employees improperly disclosed non-public information;
are addressing topics other than Hillary’s email server. See if you can guess what the OIG is looking at. The hint is Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, Bruce Ohr, Nellie Ohr.