[conservatism_IS_compassion]

From the Treehouse comments: trapper says:

The story is that Steele paid some go-betweens to talk to Russian insiders to get dirt on Trump. But that comes from Steele. Some questions:

1. Why do we accept on their face Steele’s statements as to his sources and methods?
2. Why do we accept on its face the assertion that Steele is “ex” MI-6?
3. Why do we assume that his sources were Russian?
4. Wouldn’t it make more sense to consider the possibility that globalist pro-EU elements within the British government might have concocted false and damaging stories about Trump, and used a “former” MI-6 agent to supply them to like-minded globalists in the US to use against Trump the nationalist candidate?
5. Doesn’t globalist Brit meddling in the US election to stop nationalist Trump make more sense than Russian meddling?

[lapsus calami]

 

 

After more info (such as it is) became available, those became my positions also - seems nothing but European Union/globalist stooges mixed up in this. The grousing that has been coming from Europe since Trump got elected gave it away. If anyone had incentive to mess with elections over here it would be the 4th Reich on the River Zenne.