Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Vigilanteman

Most ex-slaves remained loyal to their former owners and shared cropped to help pay the carpet bagger taxes.


228 posted on 01/07/2018 6:35:40 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies ]


To: central_va
Correct. The most economically successful plantations discovered early on that treating their slaves well led to higher productivity-- it is NOT rocket science.

Even Abigail Adams observed when the landscaping was being finished on the first white house that a couple of sturdy New England farmhands could have accomplished in a day what it took a crew of a dozen Negro slaves to do. Abigail was no racist. She was an ardent abolitionist even in those days and correctly observed the stupefying nature of the institution of slavery . . . most would work only the minimum necessary to avoid the lash.

Not so different than what happened in Soviet and Red Chinese agriculture when farming was collectivized. Once even partial private ownership of small plots of land was introduced in the post-Stalin and post-Mao eras, food production soared.

232 posted on 01/07/2018 7:21:30 AM PST by Vigilanteman (ObaMao: Fake America, Fake Messiah, Fake Black man. How many fakes can you fit into one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson