Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TheStickman

Those state laws are violate the Constitution if they seek to preempt the Federal law per se. There is no question about that. It has been decided is 40 cases by the Supreme Court. The answer is for you pot lovers is to amend the Constitution. Do you actually think that if a state passes their little law that we don’t have to pay federal income taxes that we DON’T? Are you sure that is the law? When your house gets repossessed by the Feds will you still be blabbering that nonsense?


85 posted on 01/05/2018 12:32:30 PM PST by raiderboy ( "...if we have to close down our government, weÂ’re building that wall")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: raiderboy

“The answer is for you pot lovers is to amend the Constitution.”

I knew you’d jump into fallacy land eventually.

1st off, supporting the 10th Amendment hardly qualifies anyone as a “pot lover”.

2ndly, Congress doesn’t have the right to amend the Constitution without the States ratifying. Fact: Congress had to amend the Constitution to enact alcohol prohibition. Then they had to amend the Constitution again to repeal the 18th Amendment.

So where’s the Constitutional amendment giving Fedzilla the authority to make cannabis illegal???

As I stated elsewhere in this thread. It’s my experience prohibitionists & nanny-state lovers tend to be very angry people in love with fallacies.


97 posted on 01/05/2018 2:49:37 PM PST by TheStickman (#MAGA all day every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson