Like I said, we better pile it on cuz there will be DACA of some form.
The good news? By the time criminals are shipped back, self-deporters weed themselves out, you factor in non voters, and the small (20+%) who will vote R? The impact of ALL DACA is gonna be around 100,000,or not enough to shift anything unless they are all in one state.
It still sucks that Trump is accepting the premise though. Why couldn’t he have eliminated DACA on day one?
“The good news? By the time criminals are shipped back, self-deporters weed themselves out, you factor in non voters, and the small (20+%) who will vote R? The impact of ALL DACA is gonna be around 100,000,or not enough to shift anything unless they are all in one state.”
Sorry but that’s delusional. Wishful thinking at best.
That 100k is probably on the light side, the number that keeps being reported is 800k ? That actual number should be less for the reasons you point out. But we’re already hearing numbers like 2+ million would be covered in this amnesty.
Trump has to hold the line at only these (now grown) kids.
Every bill introduce on DACA greatly expands eligibility from the 700,000 already signed up.
3.5 million is what they are shooting for.
Agreeing to any kind of amnesty would be the equivalent of raising taxes after promising: “Read my lips”.
We rejected more than a dozen GOPers who were prepared to sell us out. This is in Congress’ lap. He won’t sign amnesty.
“self deported?” Not the criminals. They will stay were the stealin is good.
Since DACA is already stopped (ie no new DACA-ites), are you meaning that the existing DACA-ites who have registered will still be here (minus criminals, etc)? Or that the DACA thing will be opened up again?
I was under the impression that as of September (IIRC) 5, there will be no new DACA applications taken and only those already registered would be considered. That stays as is, right?
I could tolerate only the existing legitimate [sic] DACA-ites staying if there are NO new ones, and NO chain migration.