Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 11th_VA

From the article:

“...This idea would hinge on companies not responding by slashing wages to offset their tax hike, ...”

Also hinges on companies not moving out of state.


12 posted on 01/03/2018 8:12:12 AM PST by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: WildHighlander57
“...This idea would hinge on companies not responding by slashing wages to offset their tax hike, ...”

Also hinges on companies not moving out of state.

Which is a trend that's been in place my entire life. For example, #1 for taxes New York State has lost an amazing 18 seats in Congress (and electoral votes) since 1950. It had 45 congressional districts in 1950. It has 27 districts today. It last had that few in 1813-1823.

So I've expected that they will try this. And that they will find some bat**** crazy Obama judge who doesn't mind being reversed who will agree. And that it will eventually be affirmed by a higher court.

New Jersey has had a $10,000 annual cap on state income tax deductions for property tax payments itself, so it will be interesting to see how they dance around that in court. I think Murphy is whistlin' past the graveyard. This is very, very, very bad for high-tax blue state politicians.

24 posted on 01/03/2018 8:33:57 AM PST by Sooth2222 (Hanlon's Razor: "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson