Posted on 01/02/2018 5:41:13 AM PST by Enlightened1
Then Trump had better light a fire under Sessions or replace him.
The legal precedent is to stuff them in your socks or underwear, then shred them with scissors and burn them.
Thank you GWB for letting Sandy Burglar off with a slap!
As an ardent Sessions non-supporter I applaud Trump for speaking up. If it is by plan or design then Trump proves again he is a genius. If Sessions doesn’t act now he never will. Lets hope he sees the light.
THAT was the WHOLE IDEA!!! They WANTED our enemies to have access to all this info, and in return they got MILLIONS and MILLIONS and MILLIONS of dollars put into the Clinton Crime Family Slush Fund! Probably BILLIONS.
They cannot ‘sacrifice’ Huma or they will piss of their close allies - the Mussulman Brotherhood.
Well, what the hell did you expect when a muslim - with ties to the Muslim Brotherhood - is made a “top aide” to the Secretary of State?
I bet she is packing her bags to go far, far away to a distant land.
—
Lebanon or Syria
Oh that TWITTER ,,, ya gotta love it ,, the transparency you won’t get from the Dims and the press and it cuts right to the marrow some times .
WINNING , WINNING , WINNING !!!
That would be treason
F’n Sessions.
...she did not intend to give out the passwords....
She may have intended to sell them...
Why does her boss get to skate?
-
One reason is it would provoke the left into mass, uncontrolled fury that could well result in violence. Think they’re deranged NOW? Imagine what would happen if we attack their Queen B. (and you can guess what the “B” stands for).
Mind you, not that I think for a MOMENT that the threat of leftist violence should stop us from doing what’s right. This creature and all her minions need to be brought to justice. We cannot have a justice system with one set of rules for we-the-people and another for these corrupt Washington scumbags (which, unfortunately, seems to include the people who run our so-called “justice” department).
Anyone else with a security clearance did something like this they would be in jail.
Security info statutes do not require intent. A violation is a violation on the face of the statute. Intent is not a presentable defense.
Lots of Freepers, me included, would love to see Hillary, BO, Holder, etc, behind bars. Realistically, I don't think that will happen.
However, lots of 2nd tier Dems - like Huma - will go under the bus as the big dogs flail around trying to protect themselves. IMO, that might be equally as good. Deprives the Dems of a bench, or in the case of the Podestas and Weinstein, a ton of money. Hillary, BO, et al, will be left isolated and powerless.
Republicans will screw things up, as politicians always overreach. But, Dems in disarray for a few years - maybe even through the '24/'28 elections? - gives conservatives a chance to roll back some of the damage that's been caused over the past 25-30 years.
Why does her boss get to skate?
—
HRC is untouchable as are all around the Clintons. They are their own law, no other laws apply to them. Bill made it so when he ascended to the Presidency and proceeded to sell China every classified/ultra secret military tech he could lay his hands on for campaign cash, receiving only a moderate slap on the wrist from jellyfish-like Congress critters who were too weak to even look at the mountains of evidence of his perfidy; making all in Congress complicit with his crimes. Instant immunity.
Unravel Huma, is to unravel Hillary, is to unravel Bill, is to unravel Obama, is to plunge the nation into the utter chaos of a full-blown Constitutional crisis, and perhaps a shooting civil war.
That’s why the nominally female thing called Hillary R. Clinton gets to skate ...
The law of averages is not on Hillary’s side. It may just be that simple.
CIRCA 2015 NYPost-— The job of Clinton damage control through a parade of scandals has fallen to her top aide (and perennial govt parasite) Cheryl Mills. Mills’ lack of cooperation is legendary. In fact, she’s been officially accused of both perjury and obstruction of justice.
Sworn affidavits, depositions and court rulings, as well as congressional reports and testimony, paint a picture of, to put it charitably, a brazenly dishonest cover-up specialist.
Among Mills shenanigans:
<><> •As White House deputy counsel, Mills ordered Commerce Department officials to “withhold” from investigators emails and other documents detailing then-President Clinton’s and First Lady Hillary Clinton’s allegedly illegal selling of seats on foreign trade junkets for campaign cash, according to sworn statements by Commerce’s former FOIA chief.
“Ms. Mills, in her position as deputy counsel to the president, advised Commerce officials to withhold certain documents,” testified Sonya Stewart Gilliam in a July 2000 sworn affidavit taken by Judicial Watch, a government watchdog group in Washington. “
The Commerce Department’s collaboration with White House Deputy Counsel Mills on these matters was, in my experience, highly irregular and at variance with normal
procedures.
<><> •At the same time, a federal judge ruled that Mills “failed miserably” to take proper steps to search for and recover 1.8 million Executive Office of the President and Office of the First Lady emails under subpoena in the Monica Lewinsky and Filegate scandal investigations, after computer contractors discovered them mysteriously missing from the automated White House archiving system. Mills, who was in charge of finding the lost email, conveniently made “the most critical error” in recovering them.
<><> US District Judge Royce Lamberth concluded in a 63-page opinion, adding that he found Mills actions “loathsome.”
In fact, Judicial Watch accused Mills of orchestrating a “cover-up” in what became known as “Email-gate.” Her court testimony in the case, during which she repeatedly
answered “I don’t have a recollection,” sounds like an interview with an amnesia patient. (In the end, the emails were never recovered).
<><> •In another scandal, Mills “concealed” so many subpoenaed emails and other documents detailing allegedly illegal fundraising activity between the White House and
the Democratic National Committee — specifically, Hillary’s illegal integration of White House and DNC computer databases — that staff lawyers for the House Government
Oversight Committee in 1998 sent a criminal referral to the Justice Department demanding federal prosecutors charge Mills with obstruction of justice and perjury.
“Ms. Mills knowingly and willfully obstructed the investigative authority of this committee by withholding
documents,” the panel concluded in a 647-page investigative report. “Moreover, when this obstruction was brought to light in a hearing before the committee, Ms. Mills lied under oath about the documents and the circumstances surrounding their nonproduction.”
<><> •In October 2012, Mills sorted through key Benghazi documents and decided which ones to withhold from an independent review board. She also leaned on witnessses.
Deputy ambassador to Libya Gregory Hicks testified before Congress in 2013 that Mills told him in an angry phone call to stop cooperating with investigators.
<><> •On behalf of the Clintons, Mills negotiated the weak conflict-of-interest rules for disclosing foreign donations to the Clinton Foundation with the Obama administration. She also reportedly helped broker international payments to the group. In short, Mills “is in the middle of it,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said.
EXCERPT-—http://nypost.com/2015/05/17/hillary-clintons-consigliere-covers-up-for-her-scandals/
Res ipsa loquitur—the thing speaks for itself.
You say that as if it were a bad thing.
The communist coup d'etat began in the 1960s and, at some point, force will be required to end it once and for all. I'm in for now when we have a CINC ready and willing to save America.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.