[lilypad]

I don’t get it...cigarette smoke is demonized but marijuana is glamorized?

[familyop]

"I don’t get it...cigarette smoke is demonized but marijuana is glamorized?"

Marijuana lowers inhibitions (white slavery) and brings in easy money (big prices for small packages). It also prepares many for bigger things (more expensive, more addictive drugs). The customers are very loyal and subservient.

[irishjuggler]

I don’t get it...cigarette smoke is demonized but marijuana is glamorized?

Yeah, it's impossible to ignore that apparent dichotomy. Right now, politicians in San Francisco and other liberal communities are in the process of trying to ban 'flavored tobacco' (or something like that) while they promote marijuana. The more anti-tobacco a place is the more pro-marijuana it seems to be. What gives? As someone who doesn't use either tobacco or marijuana but lives in the Bay Area where the former is demonized but the latter is celebrated, I've thought about this for a while and tried to make some sense out of it. My conclusion is that liberals promote pot because they (1) enjoy it themselves; and (2) want a population that is stoned and stupid and permissive. This is why we see George Soros promoting marijuana. They don't want a clear-thinking population that will question their bulls--t. An impaired-thinking population is easier to manipulate.