FABULOUS!!!!! 
Posted on 01/01/2018 11:46:16 AM PST by DollyCali
This week: Huma Abedin caught with Top Secret intel on computer, DOJ opens investigation into Hillary email scandal, DOJ opens investigation into pay-for-play in Clinton Foundation, and now Senate intel committee has requested a criminal probe into Christopher Steele/fake dossier
5. Stay with me. Grassley and Graham are contrasting documents, surrounding the "Steele Dossier", against FBI statements made in combination with those documents.
6. There is a discrepancy between the documents (provided by the FBI) which surround and outline Steele's talks with the FBI, and the statements from the FBI officials who have talked to Grassley and Graham.
7. Meaning, what the FBI is attributing to Christopher Steele, is not in alignment with the underlying evidence of what was claimed by the FBI investigators.
8. Either Christopher Steele is lying to the FBI, *OR*, the representations to Senator Graham and Grassley by the FBI officials are false.
9. Based on the documents, and based on the evidence, someone is lying.
10. Graham and Grassley believe they know who's lying (so do I), and it ain't Christopher Steele - who carries no motive to lie.
11. The fibbers are the ones who hold the motive to lie. That would be the FBI officials who are trying to hide their 2016 use of the Steele Dossier in their counterintelligence operation. (ie. getting the FISA warrant etc.)
12. So instead of telling calling out the FBI as liars. Graham and Grassley file a criminal referral requesting the DOJ prosecute Christopher Steele as a liar.
13. Graham and Grassley know the end result of the DOJ following their request would be to discover it's the FBI who are not telling the truth.
14. Grassley's use of the documents simply highlights the conflict between the actual evidence (documents), the FBI claims and what the FBI has attributed to Christopher Steele.
15. In essence Grassley and Graham are saying to the DOJ: 'If what the FBI says is true then Chris Steele is lying, because the evidence doesn't support what the FBI previously said to us'...
See how that works?
More 15. The END
***************************************Thanks Tweety...Here for the ones on a phone.
Too funny!
Excellent!!!!
Heads will begin to roll in 3...2...1!
Thanks for posting.
Thanks for directing us to this post. It really has a good explanation on the reason for the action. I needed it.
On good thing, the titillating hype of this book will be short lived....
But these investigations will go on until we find the truth, we hope.
LOCK THEM UP!!!!
Her Wikipedia page does not indicate IT expertise; but rather national security policy and law:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kirstjen_Nielsen
Here is HuffPo's alarmist take on the new Homeland Security involvement in voter fraud:
Trump’s New Plan To Uncover Voter Fraud Is Just As Alarming As His Old Plan
Yep.
FABULOUS!!!!!
Dear ones—just a bit of shoveling was done today to clear the drifts from the garage door.
Thank you for your concern for my well being—I paced myself and did splendidly.
As for my front walk and porch stairs, they have been drifted over, and I plan to let the 40 degrees on Monday do that work for me, with a little clean up.
Tomorrow will be the coldest here—3 degrees and a wind chill of -15 degrees.
I know you both have cold temps as well.
We are well stocked and don’t have to go anywhere.
Usually our snow storms are followed by moderate temps, but this one, with the extended cold and snow drifts, has thrown DE for a loop.
Mrs. exit82 told me about Donald Jr.’s tweet—he is quite funny. We’ll need to add the cessation of global warming to his dad’s list of accomplishments in his first year!
Thank you again for thinking of me.
Thanks for posting.
I hear ya. Trudeau has a "boyle" on his ass right now.
Western diplomats say the Trump administration has frozen funding to a UN relief agency that helps Palestinian refugees, per @BarakRavid: http://bit.ly/2qyYn2Y @axios
Friends and allies of Steve Bannon had been warning him for weeks to lay off Jared Kushner — telling him that President Trump would turn against him if he kept publicly attacking the son-in-law.
Excellent!
:-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.