No. It was not the insurance policy. All the facts point to the conclusion that the dossier was drummed up as a “color of law” basis for the FISA warrant. contrary to the ridiculous credulous of this clueless author there’s no evidence to show anyone in the FBI or DOJ ever believed a single one of the dossier’s claims. He also never met a liberal if he thinks they needed a dossier to frighten them into loathing the prospect of a Trump presidency.
No, the dossier was not the insurance policy; it was the pretext for the insurance policy. Spying was the insurance policy, just as Watergate was intended by a “small group” in the Nixon campaign to be their insurance policy.
agree.
Andy is having a hard time being more than lukewarm about the perfidy of the gov’t in this colossel crime of collusion against the American people...
Agreed. Some people are confusing a multipurpose tool with the project.