Skip to comments.
Inside the mass exodus at the EPA
nypost.com ^
| Yaron Steinbuch
Posted on 12/22/2017 10:23:53 AM PST by RoosterRedux
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
To: RoosterRedux
To: RoosterRedux
3
posted on
12/22/2017 10:28:16 AM PST
by
SuperLuminal
(Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
To: RoosterRedux
Its like throwing holy water on person possessed by demons.
4
posted on
12/22/2017 10:28:50 AM PST
by
PGR88
To: RoosterRedux
while i’m certain some did leave because of the stated reasons i have to say its not normal to leave a good job based on principle. How much demand in the private sector for 96 climate scientists if the government isn’t picking up the tab?
5
posted on
12/22/2017 10:28:50 AM PST
by
wiggen
(#JeSuisCharlie)
To: RoosterRedux
Good luck on the unemployment line.
6
posted on
12/22/2017 10:29:19 AM PST
by
shotgun
To: SuperLuminal
DID THEY REALLY care about the environment? Not enough to stay and fight. Their retirement is good enough for them to not care.
7
posted on
12/22/2017 10:29:41 AM PST
by
DIRTYSECRET
(urope. Why do they put up with this.)
To: RoosterRedux
To: RoosterRedux
environmental protection specialists = highly paid government employee with no real job
9
posted on
12/22/2017 10:31:00 AM PST
by
2banana
(My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
To: RoosterRedux
... Pornhub was the hardest hit...
To: RoosterRedux
The only people who leave govt. jobs are still young enough to start over, or else ready for retirement.
11
posted on
12/22/2017 10:31:28 AM PST
by
brianr10
To: RoosterRedux
If I were in charge there, I would start imposing a ton of infuriating rules and policies on all employees. I would let the computers go nuts and impose unsatisfactory performance reviews on all of them for not showing positive work progress. I would pull an Illinois and make EPA employees pay for all travel and work expenses on their own dime, then submit expense reports that dont get paid for a half year or more, apologizing by saying the computers dont work right.
I would make their lives a living hell.
12
posted on
12/22/2017 10:32:05 AM PST
by
ConservativeMind
(Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
To: RoosterRedux
I did not realize the epa had a job description of “scientist”
13
posted on
12/22/2017 10:32:30 AM PST
by
mountainlion
(Live well for those that did not make it back.)
To: RoosterRedux
As is often the case, a plausible dogood idea has been largely ruined and made into a tyrannical and grossly expensive huge program - a blight on America and a very costly damper on jobs and our economy. It definitely needs to be scaled back a lot ! And then properly focused or eliminated entirely if it cant be correctly managed
14
posted on
12/22/2017 10:32:36 AM PST
by
faithhopecharity
(“Politicians aren’t born, they’re excreted.” - Marcus Tillius Cicero (3 BCE))
To: wiggen
They’ll catch on at some state equivalent Dept of Ecology or county environmental permitting agency, all at less than 1/2 their current salary.
15
posted on
12/22/2017 10:32:47 AM PST
by
shotgun
To: RoosterRedux
I worked for the US EPA for about 100 days back in 1995 when the Dem's shut down the govt and they dismissed lots of employees.... The Office of Air Quality Management in Durham, NC was staffed with people who had joined the agency for the most part in the early 70s. They were kinda an office family group of people and took their jobs very seriously. There was a serious of maps of the US and regionally with different colored pins representing Air Quality or coded by color for bad and worst.
The EPA at that time felt that Private Corporations and Businesses for the most part managed themselves within the laws and there was very little need for government oversight since most companies had updated their production facilities/smoke stacks and emissions were down.
One of the primary reasons the Govt was shut down in 1995 was because Clinton lied to the Republicans and stood up a new EPA Agency in DC of about 1000 personnel - thus the EPA during the shutdown had to shed 1000 employees to offset the new "stove-pipe" directorate.
16
posted on
12/22/2017 10:33:13 AM PST
by
Jumper
To: RoosterRedux
More than 700 workers have left the rapidly shrinking Environmental Protection Agency since President Trump took office including more than 200 scientists, according to a report.
A small but good start at ending this anti American/good Science, monster.
17
posted on
12/22/2017 10:33:37 AM PST
by
Grampa Dave
(Build Kate's wall! Keep illegals and illegal murderers/criminals out of America! MAGA! SLAP ACT!,)
To: wiggen
The agency’s budget is being cut, another reason.
To: Grampa Dave
To: RoosterRedux
CAN NOT BE HAPPIER!!!
We nearly lost our ability to build on our 1 acre lot because of the possibility... no evidence what so ever... of “future”
water contamination in our wells. heh
NEVER HAPPENED
Collusion with a builder. They were offering a “discount” on a city lot IF we signed an agreement not to build. They were also trying to pass a LAW to prevent us from building.
I am sure there are lots of people with similar stories.
20
posted on
12/22/2017 10:39:02 AM PST
by
ConfidentConservative
(If my people shall humble themselves and pray,I will hear from Heaven and heal their land.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson