"Develop and enforce regulations
When Congress writes an environmental law, we implement it by writing regulations.
Often, we set national standards that states and tribes enforce through their own regulations. If they fail to meet the national standards, we can help them. We also enforce our regulations, and help companies understand the requirements."
Does anyone else see a fatal flaw in this process??
It was never intended as Carte Blanche, nor is there a hint of Congressional review, debate and approval by congress for Constitutional (BOR) conformance.
The EPA Tiny Tyrants too often can and have gone hog wild...
I’m against the EPA’s stated mission. There is a place for “something” very small with congressional oversight, but not the EPA.
They have been far exceeding even their stated mission. And I’d argue the people leaving don’t care about about the mission, but about using EPA’s regulatory power to do things that have nothing to do with the environment. “EPA Tiny Tyrants” is a great description (except when they aren’t so tiny)