Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kiryandil

Good. It should have been with prejudice because the withheld info was that there were government agents running around armed requiring the ranchers to respond. That’s the whole case in my mind. They were provoked into taking defensive postures.


67 posted on 12/20/2017 1:11:51 PM PST by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Support our troops by praying for their victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: xzins

Many reasons for this fiasco. Judge Navarro was in on the plan until the Defense turned up evidence which was withheld. At that point she had to start CYA. There is also the issue of their being taped conversations between clients & lawyers. That is an absolute “NO NO”. Bundys et al should be getting a huge civil settlement. Problem is the disputed evidence dies with the decision.


88 posted on 12/20/2017 2:59:19 PM PST by DrDude (Why allow Hillary to continue to breath!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson