1 posted on
12/19/2017 9:14:39 AM PST by
bitt
To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; 2ndDivisionVet; Art in Idaho; ...
2 posted on
12/19/2017 9:14:58 AM PST by
bitt
(The first to squeal gets the best deal.)
To: bitt
Another failure to prosecute by A.G. Sessions.
3 posted on
12/19/2017 9:24:27 AM PST by
Colo9250
(Sessions needs to be fired now!)
To: bitt
We The People owe a huge debt to Judicial Watch for their getting to the TRUTH!!!
To: bitt
I know we don’t like being kept in the dark and not knowing what’s going on behind the scenes. But we know Trump well enough by now to know that he wouldn’t put up with an employee who was non-productive.
8 posted on
12/19/2017 9:43:19 AM PST by
ryderann
To: bitt
Will Judicial Watch need some sort of permission to access her testimony, i.e. , a "Lerner's Permit"?
Rimshot
9 posted on
12/19/2017 9:51:39 AM PST by
TruthShallSetYouFree
(Be careful, Kimmy. Our President is Trump, not Obama!)
To: bitt
10 posted on
12/19/2017 9:58:34 AM PST by
M Kehoe
To: bitt
Misleading title. JW filed an amicus brief. This is a class action suit filed by NorCal the party
12 posted on
12/19/2017 10:10:21 AM PST by
Nifster
(I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
To: bitt
lawsuit remains sealed by the order of a judge who heard claims...they had received threatsSo to follow the logic of the judge:
the worse the tyrannical abuse and corruption of government officials is, then the bigger the anger of the people, and therefore the more reason the judge should keep the abuse and corruption secret.
Folks, the judge is trolling us serfs.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson