Posted on 12/18/2017 4:41:30 PM PST by bitt
Independent government watchdog Foundation for Accountability & Civic Trust (FACT) named Democratic Florida Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz one of Congress’ “most ethically challenged” members for her role in the House IT scandal.
Wasserman Schultz was named the second most ethically challenged member; every congressman on Congress’ list of secret harassment settlements tied for first.
Two of Wasserman Schultz’s former IT aides, Imran Awan and his wife, Hina Alvi, have been indicted on charges of conspiracy against the United States. Evidence gathered in a cybersecurity probe in the House of Representatives revealed a litany of violations, although the two aides have not yet been charged in that probe. (RELATED: Two Former Wasserman Schultz IT Aides Indicted For Conspiracy Against US)
FACT filed a complaint with the Office of Congressional Ethics in July after Wasserman Schultz continued employing Awan for months after Capitol Police said he was under investigation, and even after he was banned from the House network. Wasserman Schultz seemingly planned to continue paying Awan even after he moved back to his native country of Pakistan.
The Democratic congresswoman also tried to intimidate Capitol Police into handing over a laptop that she indicated belonged to her. She later changed her story and said the laptop belonged to Awan. The laptop’s hard drive has played a central role in the legal case against the former Democratic IT aides. (RELATED: Hard Drive Tied to Wasserman Schultz Is Central To Imran Awan Case)
Republican Florida Rep. Ron DeSantis said in August that the House IT scandal, which remains ongoing, is “one of the all-time congressional scandals in the last 30 years.”
p
also here:
and joins Alcee in the top five..
https://m.cnn.com/en/article/h_efa51a15d7d9ec92a50e923614ec12a4
Wassermann fails the test!
I see what you did there.
Never forget Rats are immune to any accusations unless they can use it to some advantage. They NEVER recuse, resign or admit wrong doing never.
“Wasserman Schultz Named One Of Congress’ ‘Most Ethically Challenged’ For House IT Scandal”
it’s actually a remarkable achievement when you think about how tough the competition was ...
I guess “F’ing Crook” wasn’t one of the choices.
Is that like trying to refer to an illegal as an undocumented person?
“The Rotters Club”
She is one of the prime examples of why the public doesn't not trust politicians.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.