Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: adorno

“Those “other murderers” would just be the “executioners” in this instance.”

In the absence of a legal sentence, there is no executioner. If someone kills that man, it is murder. The state can *never* condone murder.

“we are supposed to be a bit more civilized.”

And yet you approve of men in state custody being murdered by other prisoners.


56 posted on 12/17/2017 12:19:09 PM PST by dsc (Any pattempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: dsc
And yet you approve of men in state custody being murdered by other prisoners.

Where did I says I approve of a murder in prison by prisoners?

What I said is this:

Those "other murderers" would just be the "executioners" in this instance. Our regular appointed executioners would be glad to get a break from their very dark jobs.

Which is not the same as approving.
61 posted on 12/17/2017 4:03:06 PM PST by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: dsc
In the absence of a legal sentence, there is no executioner.

No execution in the legal sense, but still an execution.

If someone kills that man, it is murder. The state can *never* condone murder.

It is murder. I never said it wasn't.

And of course, the state would never condone that, and the murdering prisoner would be facing murder charges.
62 posted on 12/17/2017 4:07:23 PM PST by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson