To: adorno
“Those “other murderers” would just be the “executioners” in this instance.”
In the absence of a legal sentence, there is no executioner. If someone kills that man, it is murder. The state can *never* condone murder.
“we are supposed to be a bit more civilized.”
And yet you approve of men in state custody being murdered by other prisoners.
56 posted on
12/17/2017 12:19:09 PM PST by
dsc
(Any pattempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
To: dsc
And yet you approve of men in state custody being murdered by other prisoners.
Where did I says I approve of a murder in prison by prisoners?
What I said is this:
Those "other murderers" would just be the "executioners" in this instance. Our regular appointed executioners would be glad to get a break from their very dark jobs.
Which is not the same as approving.
61 posted on
12/17/2017 4:03:06 PM PST by
adorno
To: dsc
In the absence of a legal sentence, there is no executioner.
No execution in the legal sense, but still an execution.
If someone kills that man, it is murder. The state can *never* condone murder.
It is murder. I never said it wasn't.
And of course, the state would never condone that, and the murdering prisoner would be facing murder charges.
62 posted on
12/17/2017 4:07:23 PM PST by
adorno
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson