Posted on 12/16/2017 9:33:16 AM PST by Kaslin
This isn’t getting anywhere near the same amount of oxygen in the news cycle as the Net Neutrality story, but it certainly should be.
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) under the tenure of Barack Obama was busy handing out all sorts of goodies to the unions which finance most Democratic political campaigns. One particular burr under the collective, conservative saddle was a new “reinterpretation” of rules regarding the obligations of larger corporations who authorize the operation of franchises under their name. I wrote about this back in 2015 when the rule was originally finalized and it was a deplorable situation. The NLRB was basically trying to hold parent companies responsible for acting as the HR departments for all of their privately owned and managed franchises and subcontractors. This was an obvious backdoor for collective bargaining agreements and the biggest targets of the Democrats on this front were in the fast food industry. (McDonald’s actually only owns about 30% of the restaurants you see. The rest are franchised.)
Now, with some new, Trump appointed blood at the NLRB, that rule has been reversed. (NLRB website)
In a 3-2 decision (link is external), the National Labor Relations Board today overruled the Board’s 2015 decision in Browning-Ferris Industries, 362 NLRB No. 186 (2015) (“Browning-Ferris”), and returned to the pre–Browning Ferris standard that governed joint-employer liability.
In all future and pending cases, two or more entities will be deemed joint employers under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) if there is proof that one entity has exercised control over essential employment terms of another entity’s employees (rather than merely having reserved the right to exercise control) and has done so directly and immediately (rather than indirectly) in a manner that is not limited and routine.
This sounds like some dry legalese which could put some readers into a coma, but the distinction being drawn here is important. The phrase Joint Employer is critical here. When a subcontractor or franchise owner agrees to have the parent company exercise direct, immediate control over their personnel policies (rather than simply issuing “guidelines” which are left up to the smaller unit to implement and enforce) then the parent company is a true joint employer. In such cases, workers may wish to collectively bargain with the parent company or hold them accountable for labor law violations.
But when the subcontractors are left to manage their own HR affairs or the franchise owner is basically just renting out the brand name of the company, those conditions do not and should not apply. The NLRB has now wisely conceded this point. Of course, the description you’ll get of this story at the New York Times takes a decidedly different tone.
The ruling changes the standard for holding a company responsible for labor law violations that occur at another company, like a contractor or franchisee, with which it has a relationship.
The doctrine also governs whether such a corporation would have to bargain with workers at a franchise if they unionized, or whether only the owners of the franchise would have to do so.
While most labor law experts expected the labor board, which gained a Republican majority only in late September, to overturn the board’s so-called joint-employer decision from 2015, the speed of the change came as a surprise to many.
“Frankly, it’s shocking,” said Wilma B. Liebman, a former Democratic appointee on the board who once served as its chairwoman.
Oh, yes. It must be shocking indeed that the NLRB would ask the business owners who are actually employing the workers and are directly responsible for them to deal with labor law enforcement or collective bargaining. And they’re additionally shocked at how quickly it happened. Quickly? Trump has been in office for almost a full year. It took some time to get new appointments in place, but frankly, I’m personally shocked that it took this long.
As I mentioned above, this distortion of the rules under the Obama administration was primarily a sop to the unions who have been trying to go after the fast food industry for decades. In 2014 the NLRB sanctioned McDonald’s for the actions of a few franchises who they claimed had “punished” people who protested fast food restaurants. This effort later morphed into the Fight for 15 movement which has always targeted McDonald’s and the other big fast food chains. (It’s also why they’re now moving more and more to automation and simply eliminating jobs.)
It’s good to see the NLRB exercising some common sense. If you have a problem with your employer, take it up with your employer. Not with the company that they may be renting your services out to or simply paying for permission to uses their brand name.
Amazing and after watching some major pillars of justice be used against Obama era travesties to We the People some good is coming for Christmas
Ah good. Thanks for the info. This POS WILL bring the CW if he comes back. Let his sasquatch wife run.
first thought was that Obama and his cohorts are the worst abuse. He and his Administration will go down as the most corrupt in American history ever!!”
And if they don’t, then their lies and corruption has been covered up by those liars that wrote the history books. They are without peer in corruption.
Yes, and Japan has the most productive economy in the world and they don’t have any unions.
So, in other words, it is all over...it is too late...we might as well squat down and slash our throats, eh?
My God! What a Pollyanna you are!
What a refreshing whiff of sewer gas in a closed room on a hot day, right after a meal of raw pork sausage, rolled in sugar!
Maybe this time he can use his real name to do it?
I don't think his self-adopted new schtick is going to fly. "Former" presidents are yesterday's news. I think Obama will fade more quickly than most. Given the news media's major love affair with him, he has gotten very little coverage.
The point of the post:
"The march to automation has begun in earnest." is that labor displacement will bring out the worst of the Left - now being kept alive by the likes of Soros.
BTW - since I seemed to have used words that seem to reside only in history and not on Facebook- my bad, here is some help:
Woblioes- The Industrial Workers of the World (IWW), members of which are commonly termed "Wobblies", is an international labor union that was founded in 1905 in Chicago, Illinois in the United States of America. The union combines general unionism with industrial unionism, as it is a general union whose members are further organized within the industry of their employment. The philosophy and tactics of the IWW are described as "revolutionary industrial unionism", with ties to both socialist and anarchist labor movements.
Also - Chicago is where the old KGB poured money to forment discontent in the US. The Communist Party USA is based in Chiraq and one of it's leading lights was a 'mentor to' if not the actual father of a recent President.
Merry Christmas.
Simplify: Repeal the National Labor Relations Act of 1935.
Right out of the old Soviet Union playbook, eh? Anyone who disagrees with you must be mentally ill!
How can an avowed atheist be wishing anyone a “Merry Christmas”? You have to be an avowed atheist to subscribe to the Soviet Union playbook.
If you mean Obama, who’s now over in England running his mouth, I think Barry wants to be treated like the new Al Gore. The latest Snake Oil Salesman who is retired American Royalty, therefore, capable of commanding high fees for speeches and toothless decrees.
To those ‘winning’ FR: My @ss.
- Was the NLRB is disbanded (hell > freeze, pigs fly)
- The rules written EXPLICITLY stating XYZ thus, *NOT* allowing any further “reinterpretation” (what? And disable the revolving door of law > lawyer > judge?)
All it takes it another instance of musical-chairs, another empty-suit Prez., and those ‘interpretations’ are right back on the (illegal) books again.
And, I don’t see Congress (aka the (R)NC) doing a DAMN thing to make things permanent, nor correct the issue (and lose an election-year bullet-point\hand-out opportunity!?).
She’s a wookie...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.