To: Pearls Before Swine
"Are they building these without testing? If they are testing, how come we dont hear about it? Or, is testing allowed under some yield threshold?"
We and the Russians have already done so many different kinds of tests and have so much data from those, that testing isn't often needed for design any more, if at all.
28 posted on
12/13/2017 6:56:45 PM PST by
familyop
("Welcome to Costco. I love you." --Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
To: familyop
I thought that we had decided to refrain from nuclear tests many years ago, as had the Russians. There were concerns that even for in-service weapons, the lack of testing and reliance on computer projections might not be enough for the long term operational viability of the existing arsenal.
Now, these micro (for nuclear) yield weapons are so different from what has been used before, that I wondered if testing was necessary.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson