Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wonder Warthog

Not going to argue about any of that, except that concealing will always be less accessable than a holster on your hip. There are no cloaking devices.
And tactical advantage to whom? I’d prefer the “bad guys” to look elsewhere for a target, than rely on surprise to save me after the situation has escalated.


30 posted on 12/12/2017 5:20:20 PM PST by Hugh the Scot ("The days of being a keyboard commando are over. It's time to get some bloody knuckles." -Drew68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: Hugh the Scot
"Not going to argue about any of that, except that concealing will always be less accessable than a holster on your hip. There are no cloaking devices."

Undeniably true. But a practiced CC is probably faster than an unpracticed thug.

"And tactical advantage to whom? I’d prefer the “bad guys” to look elsewhere for a target, than rely on surprise to save me after the situation has escalated."

Tactical advantage to the CC holder. Most of the CC defenses I have read about, the CC holder is a bystander, and the thug's attention is focused on the liquor store/convenience store clerk. The CC holder has plenty of time to access his/her weapon. Open carry loses that. The thug is going to focus on the guy with the visible weapon first, and "might" just shoot said weapon bearer to eliminate the visible threat.

Where open carry is widely practiced, there would likely be more than one visible carrier, and the perp will likely just recede into the sunset w.o. following through on his original purpose.

32 posted on 12/13/2017 4:33:05 AM PST by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel and NRA Life Member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson