Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: moehoward; 4Runner

>
“....because of an IRS interpretation of how the rule was drafted.”
>

Yep, but will *never* happen.

When was the last time ‘void for vagueness’ was issued by a court?

Can’t have a legislative turn-style if bills/laws were concise\precise (law > courts > decree > repeat). Course, the courts no longer care about the verbiage (O’Care comes to mind....fee is a fine is a tax. “State run” exchanges != State run)

Oh, hell, the whole system’s farked anyway...


93 posted on 12/11/2017 8:07:54 AM PST by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: i_robot73

Yeah. I don’t know but this “interpretation” probably started back during W’s reign of ‘compassionate conservatism’.

It’ll be easy enough to re-interpret.

And, yes, of course the usual suspects will file suit.


94 posted on 12/11/2017 8:12:48 AM PST by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson