>
“....because of an IRS interpretation of how the rule was drafted.”
>
Yep, but will *never* happen.
When was the last time ‘void for vagueness’ was issued by a court?
Can’t have a legislative turn-style if bills/laws were concise\precise (law > courts > decree > repeat). Course, the courts no longer care about the verbiage (O’Care comes to mind....fee is a fine is a tax. “State run” exchanges != State run)
Oh, hell, the whole system’s farked anyway...
Yeah. I don’t know but this “interpretation” probably started back during W’s reign of ‘compassionate conservatism’.
It’ll be easy enough to re-interpret.
And, yes, of course the usual suspects will file suit.