I have no idea what that means.
And, as to me being a “distraction,” you responded to a comment I had written to someone else.
I wrote back to you because I'm polite, and because I had a completely legitimate challenge to your “equitable” solution.
In my political universe, treating the Democrats equitably makes as much sense as the Israelis treating Hamas and Hezbollah equitably.
We might as well stop if you don’t have any respect for being equitable to truth.
You bitch that Democrats are somehow this perfectly united front of wickedness. If you ever looked closer, you’d see that this isn’t true at all.
You also bitch that from afar, Republicans don’t appear like a formidable front against Democrat desires. If you ever looked from the Democrat side (here’s that pesky being equitable to truth that you so hate) you’d see that isn’t true either.
But ultimately you spilled the beans on your own self when you said you have no idea what being equitable to truth means.
Truth is something that stands independent of any men’s opinions. We can see aspects of it by viewing situations symmetrically. By opposing doing so, you beg your own question.
So you have no “legitimate” beef at all. You only have a “petitio principi.”