To: Olog-hai
Here’s a question: what’s so special about the “1967 borders”?
I mean, how did the international Left choose them? Why not the 1947, 1956, 1973, or 2017 borders? Why not the whole British mandate? Why any of it?
The obsession with “1967 borders” must have an explanation. Does anybody know what it is?
22 posted on
12/09/2017 10:37:08 AM PST by
Jim Noble
(Single payer is coming. Which kind do you like?)
To: Jim Noble
Would you please ping me if you get a answer?
27 posted on
12/09/2017 10:40:31 AM PST by
ColdOne
((I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11~ Best Election Ever!)
To: Jim Noble
The obsession with 1967 borders must have an explanation. Does anybody know what it is?Biggest mistake the Israelis ever made was going along with the UN. After the 6 Day War, they should have *ANNEXED* the West Bank and Golan, making the territory part of Israel proper (not so sure about Gaza: they probably should have returned it to Egypt at Camp David).
42 posted on
12/09/2017 10:52:56 AM PST by
bassmaner
(Hey commies: I am a' white male, and I am guilty of NOTHING! Sell your 'white guilt' elsewhere.)
To: Jim Noble
They are not borders; they are armistice lines. And what is so “special” about them is that they are not defensible by Israel, of course.
45 posted on
12/09/2017 10:53:52 AM PST by
Olog-hai
("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
To: Jim Noble
The 1967 borders were internationally recognized. They put a green line there.
88 posted on
12/09/2017 4:31:33 PM PST by
Lisbon1940
(No full-term Governors (at the time of election!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson