Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kabar
Pence and Trump must have had the recording of the Flynn meeting with the Russian ambassador provided by the intel community. They had no choice but to fire Flynn who was probably exceeding his authority. Still, there is no crime with discussing these matters with the Russians, only the process crime of lying about it to the FBI.

I want to revisit my response to you on this. What Flynn was discussing COULD be a crime of conspiracy, if a quid pro quo was offered and received on the call. The fact he was fired so quickly could increase that likelihood, as they may not have fired him if the subject had only very briefly been mentioned, and they thought they could (and wanted to) make that argument in his defense.

120 posted on 12/01/2017 8:29:57 AM PST by Golden Eagle (Donald Trump: "There's a lot of people disappointed in the Justice department, including me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]


To: Golden Eagle
What Flynn was discussing COULD be a crime of conspiracy, if a quid pro quo was offered and received on the call

What kind of quid pro quo are you talking about? Conspiracy to do what?

132 posted on 12/01/2017 9:09:18 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson