Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bob434
The Richard Henry Lee writings in the Federal Farmer really expand on the “people themselves” concept. Besides, the Second Amendment is unambiguous about the right to keep and bear arms being that of the people and to never be infringed.
A militia, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves, and render regular troops in a great measure unnecessary. The powers to form and arm the militia, to appoint their officers, and to command their services, are very important; nor ought they in a confederated republic to be lodged, solely, in any one member of the government.

First, the constitution ought to secure a genuine and guard against a select militia, by providing that the militia shall always be kept well organized, armed, and disciplined, and include, according to the past and general usuage of the states, all men capable of bearing arms; and that all regulations tending to render this general militia useless and defenseless, by establishing select corps of militia or distinct bodies of military men not having permanent interests and attachments in the community, to be avoided. ….
Note the wariness of standing armies.
29 posted on 11/30/2017 9:21:23 PM PST by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Olog-hai

I can’t find it now, but some states like NY actually have a clause or law or something that requires citizens to be ready to defend the state against either domestic or foreign enemies-


31 posted on 11/30/2017 9:25:06 PM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson