Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/30/2017 10:33:53 AM PST by GIdget2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: GIdget2004

Lil’ Corker and Flake(y) members of the congressional hush-slush fund?


2 posted on 11/30/2017 10:35:27 AM PST by urbanpovertylawcenter (the law and poverty collide in an urban setting and sparks fly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

HOW ABOUT A ‘CUT SPENDING’ TRIGGER???

IMPLEMENT THE PENNY PLAN NOW!

EVERY SINGLE AGENCY CAN HANDLE A 1% CUT.

DO IT EVERY YEAR UNTIL THE BUDGET IS BALANCED AND WE START PAYING DOWN THE DEBT.


3 posted on 11/30/2017 10:36:49 AM PST by Mr. K (There is no consequence of repealing Obamacare that is worse than Obamacare itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

This swamp focused interest in tax reform aka deficit increase rather than THE WALL and kill Obamacare has been horrible from day 1.


4 posted on 11/30/2017 10:37:14 AM PST by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

Rid us of RINOs.


5 posted on 11/30/2017 10:37:28 AM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

Baked in automatic tax increases. Nice. This bill gets worse all the time.


6 posted on 11/30/2017 10:38:18 AM PST by SkyPilot ("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

Congress absolutely hates lowering taxes on individuals.


7 posted on 11/30/2017 10:38:49 AM PST by Architect of Avalon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

Debt trigger? LOL

The double the National Debt in eight years under Obama and I never heard the term “debt trigger” the whole damn time.


8 posted on 11/30/2017 10:39:03 AM PST by Kickass Conservative ( Democracy, two Wolves and one Sheep deciding what's for Dinner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

Lankford is a nobody first term Senator. He better be careful pushing so hard for a tax increase.


9 posted on 11/30/2017 10:39:45 AM PST by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004; All

I am absolutely opposed to the new tax bill as it will raise MY taxes by several thousand dollars per year.

However, the idea of an automatic, triggered tax hike “just in case” is clearly some of the stupidest sh!t I ever heard come from a Republican.

And everyone know Republicans are at least as stupid as Democrats, but far less transparent about it.

Maybe I’ll luck out and this poison pill will kill the bill.


11 posted on 11/30/2017 10:40:15 AM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

Just so the trigger would automatically trigger a cut in government spending in TN and AZ.


14 posted on 11/30/2017 10:43:51 AM PST by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

Penny plan please. Dumbassery going on.


17 posted on 11/30/2017 10:56:48 AM PST by Chauncey Gardiner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

A trigger means that none of the benefits we could expect from this bill would materialize. Companies and individuals would expect the trigger to be triggered and not invest to the extent they otherwise would. This is a self fulfulling mechanism. Government is full of idiots.


20 posted on 11/30/2017 11:52:13 AM PST by jimnm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

The trigger is a bad idea. It would kick in if and only if it would also be a devastating blow to the economy. But the bill is not a “mystery” because it’s unknown whether the trigger will be included. Quite the contrary: the Senate is allowing consideration of amendments! GASP! And it’s unknown YET whether the final Senate bill will include the trigger BECAUSE THE TRIGGER HASN’T COME UP FOR A VOTE.

After the Senate votes on the trigger, it will then know whether the trigger is included in the final bill.


21 posted on 11/30/2017 11:57:21 AM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

Spend trigger should be more like it. When I realize my family will take in less money, I have to cut back on what I spend. Congress is soooooo screwed up! Please, let the revolution begin!


23 posted on 11/30/2017 12:05:18 PM PST by New Jersey Realist ( (Be Nice To Your Kids. They Will Pick Out Your Nursing Home))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

Senator Flake was just fishing for, digging for, hoping for something... ANYTHING... that would allow him to keep the high moral road and stick a big knife on Trump’s back.

He found it. He is SOOOOooo concerned about increasing the deficit! /s

Oh, now in good conscience he can cast a ‘NO’ vote. I hope others see through this and ostracize him from any future public life.

Keeping things in perspective, 1.5 Trillion over 10 years is nothing compared to Obama’s 10 Trillion over 8 years.

Also by definition 1.5 trillion does not ‘substantially increase the debt’

By definition.

Because to go forwards with a 50 vote reconciliation, the Byrd amendment says that it can only happen if it does not ‘substantially increase the debt’. The number everybody in the senate agreed that meets that criteria was 1.5 Trillion.


28 posted on 11/30/2017 3:26:48 PM PST by Toughluck_freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

How about a debt trigger to CUT SPENDING?


29 posted on 11/30/2017 3:39:19 PM PST by Joe Bfstplk (A Texas Deplorable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson