Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ObozoMustGo2012

Launching ballistic missiles from a sub may be a red line: we can monitor stationary sites, and even mobile ones, but the whole point of underwater launch capabilities is ability to launch unexpectedly both in time & location. Hitting Japan’s UN-recognized territorial waters just exacerbates the issue, and lends greater legitimacy to a kinetic response.

Don’t expect that this sub launch was unexpected. It might have surprised Obama or Clinton, but methinks Trump has been waiting for this and had good response plans in place.


27 posted on 11/28/2017 12:58:38 PM PST by ctdonath2 (It's not "white privilege", it's "Puritan work ethic". Behavior begets consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: ctdonath2

“Don’t expect that this sub launch was unexpected”

Sub launch? Says who? I haven’t seen or heard any news reporting that yet...


57 posted on 11/28/2017 1:25:56 PM PST by be-baw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: ctdonath2

The NORKS have only very old submarine technology. Stuff we can monitor from their port to wherever it suddenly goes down.


60 posted on 11/28/2017 1:30:58 PM PST by ALASKA (Watching a coup..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: ctdonath2

Sub launch? That means an EMP attack’s a real possibility. Much worse... are you sure? Is this a rumor?


63 posted on 11/28/2017 1:38:14 PM PST by GOPJ (https://www.reddit.com/r/StumpSheet/comments/6ec3z1/fake_hate_crimes_official/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson