To: simon says what
I don’t think you can compare cellphones to pot, for example. Pot is a drug. And though soda has caffeine, a drug, in it, it’s generally not known to cause erratic driving, resulting in car accidents, or work accidents, decreased productivity, or any of the other side effects of pot.
To: Flaming Conservative
I dont think you can compare cellphones to pot, for example. Pot is a drug. And though soda has caffeine, a drug, in it, its generally not known to cause erratic driving, resulting in car accidents, or work accidents, decreased productivity, or any of the other side effects of pot.
I conceded degrees of harmfulness to you. However, a degree of harmfulness does not necessitate criminalization. Regulation is the means to minimizing harmfulness, not criminalization.
As far as cellphones not being dangerous, the National Safety Council says 1 out of every 4 traffic accidents is caused by texting and driving. Cell phones seem to be more dangerous than pot.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson