Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim Robinson
…would spur an additional $1.26 trillion in federal revenues from economic growth.

And there is EXACTLY what is wrong with this "reform." The tax plan should starve the damn beast. Reduce taxes by sending far, far less tribute to Fedzilla. If that had read "would reduce federal revenues by $1.26 trillion" I would have been very happy. This REALLY hacks me off.

3 posted on 11/26/2017 11:03:42 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ProtectOurFreedom

No it wouldn’t starve the beast. They’re raising the tax take on upper income individuals by getting rid of Marie deductions and personal exemptions. This, in order to “pay for” business tax cuts. Instead of paying for them with spending cuts


5 posted on 11/26/2017 11:08:32 PM PST by WilliamIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
Yes, and that would be possible if the congressional leaders had the balls to throw out the rules that hobble them ("Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings").
6 posted on 11/26/2017 11:13:50 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
And there is EXACTLY what is wrong with this "reform."

Tax plans effect revenue streams, spending programs effect increase/reduction of cash outflow.

The only way to reduce spending is with political will, which Trump has, but not many swamp dwellers will help him.

10 posted on 11/27/2017 3:59:02 AM PST by USS Alaska (Kill all mooselimb, terrorist savages, with extreme prejudice! Deus Vult!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson