Britain's Unmarried Muslim 'Wives': the Unions Not Recognised by Law

The National ^ | November 25, 2017 | Sanya Burgess

[Winniesboy]

So this traditionalist Muslim woman was out and had a full-time job huh..? Uh, NO. that’s a very dishonest way of putting it.

But this from the article:

Ms Noor had many good things in her life: a university education, a professional career and a good salary

[Thibodeaux]

What is the urdu word for bastard?

I think the UK has lots of them

[super7man]

looking for a Westernised man who had Islamic values.

Same as a Unicorn.

[Wuli]

“They found 78% of the women they spoke to wanted the nikah to be legally recognised under British law.” ...... “Aina Khan, a family lawyer, has been raising the idea of a change to the law with the UK government for over ten years.”

And from those words we see the lies the political class has told their citizens about the deliberate clash of civilizations they have imposed on their people. And yes, it was imposed by an elitist political class socially divorced from their own people.

[ridesthemiles]

NO Western Country should change any part of their laws to accommodate invaders-—refugees or otherwise.

It isn’t expensive to have a civil ceremony in any Western country-—but having ONLY your ‘religious’ ceremony & not filing the proper civil paperwork is YOUR FAULT-—Not the fault of the citizens of the countries you have invaded.

Every single small step that Western Countries back up is another LARGE step for Islam to take us over.

[PGR88]

More fruits of diversity.

[ridesthemiles]

NO Western Country should change any part of their laws to accommodate invaders-—refugees or otherwise.

It isn’t expensive to have a civil ceremony in any Western country-—but having ONLY your ‘religious’ ceremony & not filing the proper civil paperwork is YOUR FAULT-—Not the fault of the citizens of the countries you have invaded.

Every single small step that Western Countries back up is another LARGE step for Islam to take us over.

[Georgia Girl 2]

Life is tough. Its tougher if you are stupid.

[Albion Wilde]

As a single woman, she, like many other British Muslims, was looking for a Westernised man who had Islamic values.

Uh, I see a little contradiction in terms right there.

[Trillian]

She and the man she saw as her husband were classed as a cohabiting couple. Ms Noor did not have the same rights and protections afforded to couples in a legally recognised marriage.

Sounds like the same garbage they used to argue for homosexual "marriage". It must be another test run.

[chaosagent]

Oh, THE FUNDS, huh..? So this traditionalist Muslim woman was out and had a full-time job huh..? Uh, NO.

---

Why would you think this?

The article said she had “a university education, a professional career and a good salary,” before she ever started looking for a husband.

And where does the article say anything about her being a “traditionalist Muslim woman”. What article were you reading?

Certainly seems like she would have had the ‘FUNDS’ to put toward a house.

[grey_whiskers]

Wait, I thought marriage was an outdated relic of patriarchical barbarism, and that a strong, independent woman needed a man like a fish needed a bicycle.

Also, a marriage license is just a piece of paper.

Besides, a religious ceremony is a non-binding show you put on for relatives...