Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sparklite2

Correct.

Breeders. Those who have children.

Why should childless persons subsidize you having children? Or, the double marriage deduction when only one spouse works?


18 posted on 11/19/2017 1:34:42 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Mariner

We know it’s all about SALT, Mariner.
You’re not fooling anyone.


21 posted on 11/19/2017 1:36:38 PM PST by sparklite2 (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Mariner
Why should childless persons subsidize you having children?

If you subscribe to the purely utilitarian mindset (I do not), you should make the first point dumping Social Security altogether, since those responsibly bred children will be funding YOUR Social Security. That must go first.

Don't even THINK of making a strict immigration policy stick if you discourage citizens from raising families.
26 posted on 11/19/2017 1:39:04 PM PST by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Mariner
"Correct.

Breeders. Those who have children."

The term breeders is mainly used by homosexuals, usually in a derogatory manner, to describe those who have children.

32 posted on 11/19/2017 1:43:26 PM PST by nralife (Tell Sen. John Cornyn we DO in fact want a real wall! 202-224-2934)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson