Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: smileyface

Wickard....


2 posted on 11/19/2017 4:52:20 AM PST by Paladin2 (No spelchk nor wrong word auto substition on mobile dev. Please be intelligent and deal with it....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Paladin2

“Wickard....”

Yep.

L


4 posted on 11/19/2017 4:59:58 AM PST by Lurker (President Trump isn't our last chance. President Trump is THEIR last chance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Paladin2

“Wickard....”

Making as work this morning, are ye?

I didn’t know the name of the case, but my memory was refreshed when I looked it up:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wickard_v._Filburn

“Wickard v. Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942), was a United States Supreme Court decision that dramatically increased the regulatory power of the federal government. It remains as one of the most important and far-reaching cases concerning the New Deal, and set a precedent for an expansive reading of the United States Constitution’s Commerce Clause for decades to come...

“The Court decided that Filburn’s wheat-growing activities reduced the amount of wheat he would buy for animal feed on the open market, which is traded nationally (interstate), and is therefore within the scope of the Commerce Clause...”

That’s some of the convoluted pseudo-justifications made in U. S. Supreme Court history.


5 posted on 11/19/2017 5:39:46 AM PST by be-baw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson