Yea, right! I am just so much of a neophyte that I did not know that. I don’t believe any of what I hear or see that is not total validate FACT. My response to your inane /s comment was just that, a sarcastic response that did not require a qualifier except to those too inane to figure it out.
If you want to go down this road of matching whits, I’ll turn off my brain and we can start even.
Arrogant much? Have a nice day.
Or would you rather match wits?
whit
(h)wit
noun: whit; plural noun: whits
1. a very small part or amount.wit
wit
noun: wit; plural noun: wits
1. mental sharpness and inventiveness; keen intelligence.
Yo, mazda77, arrogant much? Apparently you turned off your brain when it came to spelling, because it isn’t whits, it’s wits. As for not believing the media when they rely on unnamed sources, I agree 98% with that. The other 2% is open to the fact that there are such things as selective leaks. Because the media lazily uses unnamed sources almost exclusively these days, the game is to try to figure out who benefits most by a leak.