Dems’ ‘reckoning’ with Bill’s sexual offenses is the final nail in the Clintons’ coffin

NY Post ^ | November 16, 2017 | Seth Mandel

[Oshkalaboomboom]

I arrived at the Barnes Noble just as “An Evening With Bernie Sanders” was drawing to a close, and while browsing, I couldn’t help but notice: The twentysomethings filing out of the event with the senator were reacting as if they’d just met The Beatles.

This was Nov. 14, 2016 — less than a week after Election Day. The corpse of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign was still warm. Sanders was 75 years old, but no matter: He was the future of the Democratic Party — or at least his ideas were, and the enthusiasm with which he shepherded his flock to them.

So the recent wave of liberals “reckoning” with Bill Clinton’s sexual offenses should be put into proper context. It is not the beginning of the end for the Clintons atop the Democratic Party. It’s just the end.

[ViLaLuz]

Don’t underestimate the treachery of the Clintons. They still have information power, dirt on their enemies. Narcissistic rage knows no limit, even to murder.

[Savage Beast]

You got that right! Never attribute anything high minded to any of these sleaze bags.

[RightFighter]

I’ve been thinking the same thing. There’s a reason they’re so willing to throw their own under the bus so quickly, and it’s just too coincidental that Rose McGowan and Ashley Judd, two very vocal anti-Trump women, were among the first to get started with this MeToo movement.

[UCANSEE2]

I’m beginning to think even the Weinstein stuff was part of this plot.

Harvey was the sacrificial lamb for several reasons, but the biggest was because he quit donating to the Clinton Foundation after Hillary lost.

[Texas resident]

900 FBI files

Vince Foster.

[UCANSEE2]

This is really an announcement that the full-on communists have taken over the Democrat Party. All the recent discovery of morals is just a smokescreen. When the smoke clears, there will be nothing but hard-core communists and Islamist, working for the “revolution.”

[doug from upland]

I don’t think Clinton Foundation donating was what took down Weinstein. The Clintons did not want to see this snowball rolling down hill. It was a newspaper reporter finally doing an actual job of reporting and a woman who finally had the courage to talk. That encouraged others to talk.

When the Clintons watched this thing begin, I wonder if they worried that it would ultimately lead to them.

[UCANSEE2]

It was a newspaper reporter finally doing an actual job of reporting

He was working for NBC and they refused to air his report. He had to go to THE NEW YORKER to get it in print. Who at THE NEW YORKER decided to print it, and do they have any links to the Clintons ?