Emphatically no.
Does she lose her right to be protected against sexual harassment?
Emphatically no.
Does she lose her right to be protected against sexual assault?
Emphatically no.
So are the Al Frankensteins of the world allowed to rape her???
Emphathically no.
Are you equating that Franken photo with rape?
Do you think that a women who poses half nude in the act of removing her bra on a magazine cover that is sold nationwide, and has done so numerous times, just might have a different threshold of public "humiliation?"
The unwanted tongue kiss is sexual assault. The photo is a joke in poor taste. There isn't even contact in the photo.
I understand the appeal of playing "gotcha" politics, but crying "grope" because of that photo demeans and cheapens real victims of real sexual assault.
No, I am not equating that photo with rape. Of course not.
HELLO!
What, you have a photographic "feeler gauge"? That action is close enough for a good slap to his face, if she were awake.
Never mind some gratuitous "investigation"...throw his ass out now Turtle.
It’s a photo in real bad taste, but he isn’t touching her.
She did agree to the kiss too.