In short, a woman added identifying information after the signature — for what reason?
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
IMO, the accuser is bought and paid for - already lied about being a Trump voter. I don’t know if this is her yearbook or if she somehow got one where Moore had written an inscription. The date/restaurant were added to connect him to the restaurant where she worked & as “proof” that he was there & thus, must have done what she accused him of doing. The big complaint with the accusers coming out of the woodwork like cockroaches just before the election has been that it is ‘he said/she said’ - this is an effort to provide some sort of physical proof. To me, it is OBVIOUS that this is not all Moore’s writing & further evidence of a setup, IMO.
I want to see the rest of the yearbook. Was this the only annotated inscription?