Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Zeneta
I'm thinking that the camera picked up spectral difference in the ink that the naked eye didn't see.

Recall how in 2004 John Kerry's daughter was wearing an opaque dress that became transparent under the flash of photographers' cameras? Is it possible that high definition still cameras (it's unclear if a flash was used) has such high density over video cameras that it picked up the differences in hue in the ink that were missed by the naked eye?

-PJ

102 posted on 11/14/2017 1:25:06 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: Political Junkie Too

The fact is that Black ink or Blue for that matter isn’t always what it seems.

Run them through a few filters and even a Democrat/Rino can see the difference.

The question is whether or not they want to see it.


106 posted on 11/14/2017 1:31:15 PM PST by Zeneta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson